debian/notmuch
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.notmuchmail.org/git/notmuch synced 2024-12-01 07:04:10 +01:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions
notmuch/test/corpora/protected-headers/encrypted-signed-not-masked.eml

34 lines
1.1 KiB
Text
Raw Permalink Normal View History

test: protected headers should work when both encrypted and signed. Up to this point, we've tested protected headers on messages that have either been encrypted or signed, but not both. This adds a couple tests of signed+encrypted messages, one where the subject line is masked (outside subject line is "Subject Unavailable") and another where it is not (outside Subject: matches inner Subject:) See the discussion at https://dkg.fifthhorseman.net/blog/e-mail-cryptography.html#protected-headers for more details about the nuances between signed, stripped, and stubbed headers. Signed-off-by: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
2019-05-27 00:16:04 +02:00
From: test_suite@notmuchmail.org
To: test_suite@notmuchmail.org
Subject: Rhinoceros dinner
Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2000 12:00:00 +0000
Message-ID: <encrypted-signed-not-masked@crypto.notmuchmail.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/encrypted; boundary="=-=-=";
protocol="application/pgp-encrypted"
--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-encrypted
Version: 1
--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/octet-stream
-----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----
test: replace aging OpenPGP key used in the test suite This replaces the old OpenPGPv4 key that is used in the test suite with a more modern OpenPGPv4 key. All cryptographic artifacts in the test suite are updated accordingly. Having old cryptographic artifacts in the test suite presents a problem once the old algorithms are rejected by contemporary implementations. For reference, this is the old key. sec rsa1024 2011-02-05 [SC] 5AEAB11F5E33DCE875DDB75B6D92612D94E46381 uid [ unknown] Notmuch Test Suite <test_suite@notmuchmail.org> (INSECURE!) ssb rsa1024 2011-02-05 [E] And this is the new key. Note that is has the same shape, but uses Ed25519 and Cv25519 instead of 1024-bit RSA. sec ed25519 2022-09-07 [SC] 9A3AFE6C60065A148FD4B58A7E6ABE924645CC60 uid [ultimate] Notmuch Test Suite (INSECURE!) <test_suite@notmuchmail.org> ssb cv25519 2022-09-07 [E]
2022-09-22 10:46:06 +02:00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=wKPm
test: protected headers should work when both encrypted and signed. Up to this point, we've tested protected headers on messages that have either been encrypted or signed, but not both. This adds a couple tests of signed+encrypted messages, one where the subject line is masked (outside subject line is "Subject Unavailable") and another where it is not (outside Subject: matches inner Subject:) See the discussion at https://dkg.fifthhorseman.net/blog/e-mail-cryptography.html#protected-headers for more details about the nuances between signed, stripped, and stubbed headers. Signed-off-by: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
2019-05-27 00:16:04 +02:00
-----END PGP MESSAGE-----
--=-=-=--
Reference in a new issue Copy permalink