notmuch/test/T810-tsan.suppressions

# It's unclear how TSan-friendly GLib is:
# https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/issues/1672
called_from_lib:libglib*.so
lib: replace some uses of Query::MatchAll with a thread-safe alternative This replaces two instances of Xapian::Query::MatchAll with the equivalent but thread-safe alternative Xapian::Query(std::string()). Xapian::Query::MatchAll maintains an internal pointer to a refcounted Xapian::Internal::QueryTerm. None of this is thread-safe but that wouldn't be an issue if Xapian::Query::MatchAll wasn't static. Because it's static, the refcounting goes awry when Notmuch is called from multiple threads. This is actually documented by Xapian: https://github.com/xapian/xapian/blob/4715de3a9fcee741587439dc3cc1d2ff01ffeaf2/xapian-core/include/xapian/query.h#L65 While static, Xapian::Query::MatchNothing is safe because it doesn't maintain an internal object and as such, doesn't use references. Two best-effort tests making use of TSan were added to showcase the issue (I couldn't figure out a way to deterministically reproduce it without making an unmaintainable mess). First, when two databases are created in parallel, a query that uses Xapian::Query::MatchAll is made (lib/query.cc), resulting in the following backtrace on a segfault: #0 0x00007ffff76822af in Xapian::Query::get_terms_begin (this=0x7fffe80137f0) at api/query.cc:141 #1 0x00007ffff7f933f5 in _notmuch_query_cache_terms (query=0x7fffe80137c0) at lib/query.cc:176 #2 0x00007ffff7f93784 in _notmuch_query_ensure_parsed_xapian (query=0x7fffe80137c0) at lib/query.cc:225 #3 0x00007ffff7f9381a in _notmuch_query_ensure_parsed (query=0x7fffe80137c0) at lib/query.cc:260 #4 0x00007ffff7f93bfe in _notmuch_query_search_documents (query=0x7fffe80137c0, type=0x7ffff7fa9b1e "mail", out=0x7ffff666da18) at lib/query.cc:361 #5 0x00007ffff7f93ba4 in notmuch_query_search_messages (query=0x7fffe80137c0, out=0x7ffff666da18) at lib/query.cc:349 #6 0x00007ffff7f83d98 in notmuch_database_upgrade (notmuch=0x7fffe8000bd0, progress_notify=0x0, closure=0x0) at lib/database.cc:934 #7 0x00007ffff7fa110f in notmuch_database_create_with_config (database_path=0x7ffff666dcb0 "/tmp/notmuch.MZ2AGr", config_path=0x7ffff7faab3c "", profile=0x0, database=0x0, status_string=0x7ffff666dc90) at lib/open.cc:754 #8 0x00007ffff7fa0d6f in notmuch_database_create_verbose (path=0x7ffff666dcb0 "/tmp/notmuch.MZ2AGr", database=0x0, status_string=0x7ffff666dc90) at lib/open.cc:653 #9 0x00007ffff7fa0ceb in notmuch_database_create (path=0x7ffff666dcb0 "/tmp/notmuch.MZ2AGr", database=0x0) at lib/open.cc:637 ... Second, some queries would make use of Xapian::Query::MatchAll (lib/regexp-fields.cc), resulting in the following backtrace on a segfault: #0 0x00007f629828b690 in Xapian::Internal::QueryBranch::gather_terms (this=0x7f628800def0, void_terms=0x7f629726d5a0) at api/queryinternal.cc:1245 #1 0x00007f629828c260 in Xapian::Internal::QueryScaleWeight::gather_terms (this=0x7f628800df70, void_terms=0x7f629726d5a0) at api/queryinternal.cc:1434 #2 0x00007f629828b69f in Xapian::Internal::QueryBranch::gather_terms (this=0x7f628800dd90, void_terms=0x7f629726d5a0) at api/queryinternal.cc:1245 #3 0x00007f6298282571 in Xapian::Query::get_unique_terms_begin (this=0x7f628800dcd8) at api/query.cc:166 #4 0x00007f629841a59b in Xapian::Weight::Internal::accumulate_stats (this=0x7f628800dca0, subdb=..., rset=...) at weight/weightinternal.cc:86 #5 0x00007f62983c15ba in LocalSubMatch::prepare_match (this=0x7f628800df20, nowait=true, total_stats=...) at matcher/localsubmatch.cc:172 #6 0x00007f62983c8fcc in prepare_sub_matches (leaves=std::vector of length 1, capacity 1 = {...}, stats=...) at matcher/multimatch.cc:237 #7 0x00007f62983c98a3 in MultiMatch::MultiMatch (this=0x7f629726d9a0, db_=..., query_=..., qlen=3, omrset=0x0, collapse_max_=0, collapse_key_=4294967295, percent_cutoff_=0, weight_cutoff_=0, order_=Xapian::Enquire::ASCENDING, sort_key_=0, sort_by_=Xapian::Enquire::Internal::VAL, sort_value_forward_=true, time_limit_=0, stats=..., weight_=0x7f6288008d50, matchspies_=std::vector of length 0, capacity 0, have_sorter=false, have_mdecider=false) at matcher/multimatch.cc:353 #8 0x00007f629826fcba in Xapian::Enquire::Internal::get_mset (this=0x7f628800e0b0, first=0, maxitems=0, check_at_least=0, rset=0x0, mdecider=0x0) at api/omenquire.cc:569 #9 0x00007f629827181c in Xapian::Enquire::get_mset (this=0x7f629726db80, first=0, maxitems=0, check_at_least=0, rset=0x0, mdecider=0x0) at api/omenquire.cc:937 #10 0x00007f6298be529a in _notmuch_query_search_documents (query=0x7f6288009750, type=0x7f6298bfaafe "mail", out=0x7f629726dcc0) at lib/query.cc:447 #11 0x00007f6298be4ae8 in notmuch_query_search_messages (query=0x7f6288009750, out=0x7f629726dcc0) at lib/query.cc:349 ... Printing Xapian::Query::MatchAll->internal.px->_refs in these circumstances can help quickly identifying this scenario. This is motivated by some test frameworks (like Rust's Cargo) that runs unit tests in parallel and would easily encounter this issue, unless client code gates every call to Notmuch behind a lock. This is what can be expected from the tests when they fail: == stderr == +================== +WARNING: ThreadSanitizer: data race (pid=207931) + Read of size 1 at 0x7b10000001a0 by thread T2: + #0 memcpy <null> (libtsan.so.2+0x62506) + #1 void std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_construct<char>(char, char*, std::forward_iterator_tag) [clone .isra.0] <null> (libxapian.so.30+0x872b3) + + Previous write of size 8 at 0x7b10000001a0 by thread T1: + #0 operator new(unsigned long) <null> (libtsan.so.2+0x8ba83) + #1 Xapian::Query::Query(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&, unsigned int, unsigned int) <null> (libxapian.so.30+0x855cd) ... 2023-03-02 18:59:15 +01:00			`# It's unclear how TSan-friendly GLib is:`
			`# https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/issues/1672`
test: suppress all interceptors in glib On ppc64el, races are detected by TSan: WARNING: ThreadSanitizer: data race (pid=4520) Read of size 8 at 0x7ffff20016c0 by thread T1: #0 strlen ../../../../src/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_interceptors.inc:386 (libtsan.so.2+0x77c0c) #1 strlen ../../../../src/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_interceptors.inc:378 (libtsan.so.2+0x77c0c) #2 g_strdup ../../../glib/gstrfuncs.c:362 (libglib-2.0.so.0+0xa4ac4) Previous write of size 8 at 0x7ffff20016c0 by thread T2: #0 malloc ../../../../src/libsanitizer/tsan/tsan_interceptors_posix.cpp:647 (libtsan.so.2+0x471f0) #1 g_malloc ../../../glib/gmem.c:130 (libglib-2.0.so.0+0x7bb68) Location is heap block of size 20 at 0x7ffff20016c0 allocated by thread T2: #0 malloc ../../../../src/libsanitizer/tsan/tsan_interceptors_posix.cpp:647 (libtsan.so.2+0x471f0) #1 g_malloc ../../../glib/gmem.c:130 (libglib-2.0.so.0+0x7bb68) This appears to be a false positive in GLib, as explained at https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/issues/1672#note_1831968 In short, a call to fstat fails under TSan and GLib's g_sterror will intern the error message, which will be reused by other threads. Since upstream appears to be aware that GLib doesn't play nicely with TSan, suppress everything coming from the library instead of maintaining a fine grained list. Reported at https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=notmuch&arch=ppc64el&ver=0.38%7Erc0-1&stamp=1692959868&raw=0 2023-08-30 14:52:55 +02:00			`called_from_lib:libglib*.so`