mirror of
https://git.notmuchmail.org/git/notmuch
synced 2024-11-24 20:08:10 +01:00
58 lines
2.3 KiB
Text
58 lines
2.3 KiB
Text
|
From: "Carl Worth" <cworth@cworth.org>
|
||
|
|
To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
|
||
|
|
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 03:02:43 -0800
|
||
|
|
Subject: [notmuch] New to the list
|
||
|
|
In-Reply-To: <1258498485-sup-142@elly>
|
||
|
|
References: <1258498485-sup-142@elly>
|
||
|
|
Message-ID: <87bpj0qeng.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 23:57:18 +0100, Israel Herraiz <isra at herraiz.org> wrote:
|
||
|
|
> I have subscribed to the list. As suggested by the welcome message, I
|
||
|
|
> am introducing myself. My name is Israel Herraiz, and I have done a
|
||
|
|
> couple of contributions to Sup, the probably well-known here e-mail
|
||
|
|
> client.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Welcome, Israel!
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
I'm glad people read that little bit of text in the welcome email and
|
||
|
|
are introducing themselves. I like to think of our new notmuch community
|
||
|
|
as a very personable place.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
> "Not much" sounds interesting, and I wonder whether it could be
|
||
|
|
> integrated with the views of Sup (inbox, threads, etc). So I have
|
||
|
|
> subscribed to the list to keep an eye on what's going on here.
|
||
|
|
>
|
||
|
|
> I have just heard of "Not much". I have not even tried to download the
|
||
|
|
> code yet.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Yes, take a look. If you're already an emacs user, then you'll find the
|
||
|
|
interface of notmuch very comfortable, (looks a lot like sup, but lives
|
||
|
|
inside of emacs). Even outside of emacs, the command line interface of
|
||
|
|
notmuch gives view *fairly* similar to those of sup:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
notmuch search tag:inbox # Very much like sup's inbox
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
notmuch show thread:some-thread-id # A lot like sup's thread -view
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The command-line output right now isn't nearly as neat as sup's, (it
|
||
|
|
doesn't elide comments--it doesn't do the indenting of threads, etc.),
|
||
|
|
even though the command-line interface has all the information it needs
|
||
|
|
to do that. The reason for that is to let the emacs code own most of the
|
||
|
|
formatting, (so that it can be more flexible--such as making hidden
|
||
|
|
things visible, changing column widths, etc.).
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
But one thing I wonder is if there would be situations where it would
|
||
|
|
make sense to get the cleaner output directly out of the command-line
|
||
|
|
tool.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
For example, for someone who isn't an emacs user, the command-line
|
||
|
|
interface might be their only introduction to what the "notmuch
|
||
|
|
experience" is like. So maybe "notmuch show" should give nice clean
|
||
|
|
output by default and then the emacs code could call "notmuch show
|
||
|
|
--format=emacs-friendly" or something to get the current output.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
That's an idea anyway.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
-Carl
|
||
|
|
|