notmuch/test/corpus/cur/52:2,

40 lines
1.3 KiB
Text
Raw Normal View History

Message-ID: <4EFC743A.3060609@april.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2010 15:07:54 +0100
From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois_Boulogne?=" <boulogne.f@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686;
rv:9.0) Gecko/20111224 Thunderbird/9.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>,
"Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)" <aur-general@archlinux.org>
References: <4EFC3931.6030007@april.org> <4EFC3D62.4030202@archlinux.org>
In-Reply-To: <4EFC3D62.4030202@archlinux.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [aur-general] Guidelines: cp, mkdir vs install
Le 29/12/2011 11:13, Allan McRae a <20>crit :
> On 29/12/11 19:56, Fran<61>ois Boulogne wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Looking to improve the quality of my packages, I read again the guidelines.
>> https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_Packaging_Standards
>>
>> However, it don't see anything about the install command like
>> install -d $pkgdir/usr/{bin,share/man/man1,share/locale}
>>
>> Some contributors on AUR use cp or mkdir to install files/dir (when no
>> makefile is provided) and others use install command.
>>
>> What's the opinion of TU on this point?
>>
>
> Use install with -m specifying the correct permissions
>
Thank you Allan
--
Fran<EFBFBD>ois Boulogne.
https://www.sciunto.org