notmuch/test/corpora/lkml/cur/1382298793.003472:2,

85 lines
3.6 KiB
Text
Raw Normal View History

From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Subject: Re: rfc: rewrite commit subject line for subsystem maintainer
preference tool
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 15:57:55 -0800
Lines: 29
Message-ID: <1289951875.28741.261.camel@Joe-Laptop>
References: <1289850773.16461.166.camel@Joe-Laptop>
<20101116104921.GL12986@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main>
<1289919077.28741.50.camel@Joe-Laptop>
<20101116183707.179964dd@schatten.dmk.lab>
<20101116181226.GB26239@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main>
<20101116203522.65240b18@schatten.dmk.lab>
<20101116195530.GA7523@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main>
<20101116122102.86e7e0b9.rdunlap@xenotime.net>
<1289940156.28741.207.camel@Joe-Laptop>
<20101116124609.382e42fb.rdunlap@xenotime.net>
<20101116232258.GC24623@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
<20101116152835.b0ab571c.rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Florian Mickler <florian@mickler.org>,
Jiri Kosina <trivial@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
X-From: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Nov 17 00:58:26 2010
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Envelope-to: glk-linux-kernel-3@lo.gmane.org
Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67])
by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>)
id 1PIVPr-0004pn-AW
for glk-linux-kernel-3@lo.gmane.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 00:58:23 +0100
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
id S1757099Ab0KPX56 (ORCPT <rfc822;glk-linux-kernel-3@m.gmane.org>);
Tue, 16 Nov 2010 18:57:58 -0500
Received: from mail.perches.com ([173.55.12.10]:1485 "EHLO mail.perches.com"
rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
id S1751238Ab0KPX55 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
Tue, 16 Nov 2010 18:57:57 -0500
Received: from [192.168.1.162] (unknown [192.168.1.162])
by mail.perches.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18B3A24368;
Tue, 16 Nov 2010 15:55:38 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20101116152835.b0ab571c.rdunlap@xenotime.net>
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1063505>
On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 15:28 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 23:22:58 +0000 Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:46:09PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > > On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 12:42:36 -0800 Joe Perches wrote:
> > > > Some subsystem maintainers like upper case, some mixed, some lower.
> > > > Some aren't consistent. (Staging/staging)
> > > Case usually doesn't matter to most of us.
> > Given that we're working in case sensitive languages here it's probably
> > safe to assume that a reasonable proportion of people will care; being
> > reasonably consistent with existing practice for the subsystem seems
> > sensible.
> Greg takes patches that say STAGING or Staging or staging.
Greg seems to rewrite patch subjects and is inconsistent
about case, so he might be doing that by hand.
> DaveM takes patches that say net: or netdev: or network: or NET:
DaveM doesn't appear to be choosy about patch subject lines.
He seems to take any sensible patch and as far as I know he
doesn't edit the subject lines. He does reject inferior
patches outright.
> The sound maintainers take patches that say sound: or alsa: or ALSA:
The sound maintainers seem to rewrite patch subjects on an
ad-hoc basis.