debian/notmuch
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.notmuchmail.org/git/notmuch synced 2024-11-21 18:38:08 +01:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Fix memory leak in notmuch_thread_results_t

Browse source 
If we were using a talloc-based resizing array then this wouldn't
have happened. Of course, thanks to valgrind for catching this.
This commit is contained in:
Carl Worth 2009-10-26 14:02:58 -07:00
parent 3dce200788
commit 1726c5c814
1 changed files with 14 additions and 1 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

15
query.cc
View file

@ -158,6 +158,18 @@ notmuch_query_search_messages (notmuch_query_t *query)
return results;
}
/* Glib objects force use to use a talloc destructor as well, (but not
* nearly as ugly as the for message_results due to C++ objects). At
* this point, I'd really like to have some talloc-friendly
* equivalents for the few pieces of glib that I'm using. */
static int
_notmuch_thread_results_destructor (notmuch_thread_results_t *results)
{
g_ptr_array_free (results->thread_ids, TRUE);
return 0;
}
notmuch_thread_results_t *
notmuch_query_search_threads (notmuch_query_t *query)
{
@ -175,6 +187,8 @@ notmuch_query_search_threads (notmuch_query_t *query)
thread_results->thread_ids = g_ptr_array_new ();
thread_results->index = 0;
talloc_set_destructor (thread_results, _notmuch_thread_results_destructor);
seen = g_hash_table_new_full (g_str_hash, g_str_equal,
free, NULL);
@ -285,6 +299,5 @@ notmuch_thread_results_advance (notmuch_thread_results_t *results)
void
notmuch_thread_results_destroy (notmuch_thread_results_t *results)
{
g_ptr_array_free (results->thread_ids, TRUE);
talloc_free (results);
}