From 385f62baa1df439cb6365101faf31c0f6f2f2935 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2016 12:26:12 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] update link to Chip Rosenthal article about reply-to munging The original link is currently returning an internal server error :( --- notmuch-reply.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/notmuch-reply.c b/notmuch-reply.c index a74194a3..457e54ab 100644 --- a/notmuch-reply.c +++ b/notmuch-reply.c @@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ add_recipients_from_message (GMimeMessage *reply, unsigned int n = 0; /* Some mailing lists munge the Reply-To header despite it being A Bad - * Thing, see http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html + * Thing, see http://marc.merlins.org/netrants/reply-to-harmful.html * * The munging is easy to detect, because it results in a * redundant reply-to header, (with an address that already exists