From 55a78d5dbd96b80939458d9d6cc8a536b1befa87 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Carl Worth Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 14:11:38 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] test: Use increment_mtime rather than sleep The sleep was to force the directory's mtime to advance between the previous notmuch new and the subsequent rm;notmuch new. The current convention is to use the existing increment_mtime function for this purpose, (which avoids the test suite being slowed down by calls to sleep). Thanks to Austin Clements for noticing this undesired sleep. --- test/search-folder-coherence | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/test/search-folder-coherence b/test/search-folder-coherence index cf3ba40d..9c312542 100755 --- a/test/search-folder-coherence +++ b/test/search-folder-coherence @@ -34,10 +34,9 @@ test_begin_subtest "Test matches folder:spam" output=$(notmuch search folder:spam) test_expect_equal "$output" "thread:0000000000000001 2001-01-05 [1/1] Notmuch Test Suite; Test message #1 (inbox unread)" -sleep 1; - test_begin_subtest "Remove folder:spam copy of email" rm $dir/spam/$(basename $file_x) +increment_mtime $dir/spam output=$(NOTMUCH_NEW) test_expect_equal "$output" "No new mail. Detected 1 file rename."