mirror of
https://git.notmuchmail.org/git/notmuch
synced 2024-11-21 18:38:08 +01:00
cli/reply: use dedicated functions for reply to mapping
The main motivation here is to move the special casing around reply-to/from handling into a function of its own, clarifying the main logic.
This commit is contained in:
parent
301a65b0f2
commit
78520673fa
1 changed files with 49 additions and 33 deletions
|
@ -256,17 +256,13 @@ scan_address_string (const char *recipients,
|
|||
* in either the 'To' or 'Cc' header of the message?
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static int
|
||||
reply_to_header_is_redundant (notmuch_message_t *message)
|
||||
reply_to_header_is_redundant (notmuch_message_t *message, const char *reply_to)
|
||||
{
|
||||
const char *reply_to, *to, *cc, *addr;
|
||||
const char *to, *cc, *addr;
|
||||
InternetAddressList *list;
|
||||
InternetAddress *address;
|
||||
InternetAddressMailbox *mailbox;
|
||||
|
||||
reply_to = notmuch_message_get_header (message, "reply-to");
|
||||
if (reply_to == NULL || *reply_to == '\0')
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
list = internet_address_list_parse_string (reply_to);
|
||||
|
||||
if (internet_address_list_length (list) != 1)
|
||||
|
@ -291,6 +287,47 @@ reply_to_header_is_redundant (notmuch_message_t *message)
|
|||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static const char *get_sender(notmuch_message_t *message)
|
||||
{
|
||||
const char *reply_to;
|
||||
|
||||
reply_to = notmuch_message_get_header (message, "reply-to");
|
||||
if (reply_to && *reply_to) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Some mailing lists munge the Reply-To header despite it
|
||||
* being A Bad Thing, see
|
||||
* http://marc.merlins.org/netrants/reply-to-harmful.html
|
||||
*
|
||||
* The munging is easy to detect, because it results in a
|
||||
* redundant reply-to header, (with an address that already
|
||||
* exists in either To or Cc). So in this case, we ignore the
|
||||
* Reply-To field and use the From header. This ensures the
|
||||
* original sender will get the reply even if not subscribed
|
||||
* to the list. Note that the address in the Reply-To header
|
||||
* will always appear in the reply if reply_all is true.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (! reply_to_header_is_redundant (message, reply_to))
|
||||
return reply_to;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return notmuch_message_get_header (message, "from");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static const char *get_to(notmuch_message_t *message)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return notmuch_message_get_header (message, "to");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static const char *get_cc(notmuch_message_t *message)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return notmuch_message_get_header (message, "cc");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static const char *get_bcc(notmuch_message_t *message)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return notmuch_message_get_header (message, "bcc");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Augment the recipients of 'reply' from the "Reply-to:", "From:",
|
||||
* "To:", "Cc:", and "Bcc:" headers of 'message'.
|
||||
*
|
||||
|
@ -310,43 +347,22 @@ add_recipients_from_message (GMimeMessage *reply,
|
|||
notmuch_bool_t reply_all)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct {
|
||||
const char *header;
|
||||
const char *fallback;
|
||||
const char * (*get_header)(notmuch_message_t *message);
|
||||
GMimeRecipientType recipient_type;
|
||||
} reply_to_map[] = {
|
||||
{ "reply-to", "from", GMIME_RECIPIENT_TYPE_TO },
|
||||
{ "to", NULL, GMIME_RECIPIENT_TYPE_TO },
|
||||
{ "cc", NULL, GMIME_RECIPIENT_TYPE_CC },
|
||||
{ "bcc", NULL, GMIME_RECIPIENT_TYPE_BCC }
|
||||
{ get_sender, GMIME_RECIPIENT_TYPE_TO },
|
||||
{ get_to, GMIME_RECIPIENT_TYPE_TO },
|
||||
{ get_cc, GMIME_RECIPIENT_TYPE_CC },
|
||||
{ get_bcc, GMIME_RECIPIENT_TYPE_BCC },
|
||||
};
|
||||
const char *from_addr = NULL;
|
||||
unsigned int i;
|
||||
unsigned int n = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Some mailing lists munge the Reply-To header despite it being A Bad
|
||||
* Thing, see http://marc.merlins.org/netrants/reply-to-harmful.html
|
||||
*
|
||||
* The munging is easy to detect, because it results in a
|
||||
* redundant reply-to header, (with an address that already exists
|
||||
* in either To or Cc). So in this case, we ignore the Reply-To
|
||||
* field and use the From header. This ensures the original sender
|
||||
* will get the reply even if not subscribed to the list. Note
|
||||
* that the address in the Reply-To header will always appear in
|
||||
* the reply if reply_all is true.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (reply_to_header_is_redundant (message)) {
|
||||
reply_to_map[0].header = "from";
|
||||
reply_to_map[0].fallback = NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE (reply_to_map); i++) {
|
||||
const char *recipients;
|
||||
|
||||
recipients = notmuch_message_get_header (message,
|
||||
reply_to_map[i].header);
|
||||
if ((recipients == NULL || recipients[0] == '\0') && reply_to_map[i].fallback)
|
||||
recipients = notmuch_message_get_header (message,
|
||||
reply_to_map[i].fallback);
|
||||
recipients = reply_to_map[i].get_header (message);
|
||||
|
||||
n += scan_address_string (recipients, config, reply,
|
||||
reply_to_map[i].recipient_type, &from_addr);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue