This changes makes the sexp query parser consistent with the infix one
in ignoring trailing '/'. Here we do a bit better and ignore any
number of trailing '/'.
This is mainly to make sure we get trailing / removal correct. Also
add regression test for path: in the infix parser matching the
existing one for folder:.
This resolves an old bug reported by David Edmondson in 2014. The fix
is only needed for the "boolean" case, as probabilistic / phrase
searching already ignores punctuation.
This fix is only for the infix (xapian provided) query parser.
[1]: id:cunoasuolcv.fsf@gargravarr.hh.sledj.net
This duplicates the bug reported in [1], as well as adding some simple
regression tests for 'path' and 'folder' searches which were
previously missing for sexp syntax.
[1]: id:cunoasuolcv.fsf@gargravarr.hh.sledj.net
In [1], David Edmondson observed that the trailing / added by many
completion mechanisms causes path searches to silently fail. This
test reproduces that bug for both `path:' and `folder:' searches.
[1]: id:cunoasuolcv.fsf@gargravarr.hh.sledj.net
It is fragile to encode the generated names into tests, as it makes
tests break when e.g. new tests are added. There is a possibility
that this will hide certain failures; in that case meaningful filenames
should be chosen for the generated messages.
These are loosely modelled on the tests just above for date ranges,
since the error conditions are similar. Some ideas also borrowed from
T570-revision-tracking.
The default argument processing overlaps somewhat with what is already
done in _notmuch_date_strings_to_query, but we can give more specific
error messages for the s-expression context.
The extra generality of _sexp_parse_range will be useful when we
implement additional range prefixes (at least 'lastmod' is needed).
This fixes the bug reported by dkg in [1]. The movement of the call to
n-m-setup-message-for-saving is so the cleanup of Fcc headers happens
in the encoded version (otherwise Fcc headers may be saved to disk).
[1]: id:87k1zm225v.fsf@fifthhorseman.net
Based on the method outlined by Daniel Kahn Gillmor in
id:87k1zm225v.fsf@fifthhorseman.net. With a delay of 0.2 seconds the
test becomes flaky on my machine. With a 1 second delay it fails
consistently for more than 1600 iterations.
This matches the heuristic used by "notmuch config set" to decide if
something is a list.
This change fixes the bug reported at [1].
[1]: id:6O3LTUhoXlrnkPWCtPJCP4cagU7mFVEdyTpcC_37BoSzStlARXDBa7oczy6hB0jyjGjBQvgj_jFV58cw0aNx-jUg1h1O-FQ7820k68C0X4M=@protonmail.com
In [1] Ian observed that notmuch setup was inconsistent with notmuch
config set when adding single items, namely adding an unneeded
semi-colon at the end. This test replicates that bug.
[1]: id:6O3LTUhoXlrnkPWCtPJCP4cagU7mFVEdyTpcC_37BoSzStlARXDBa7oczy6hB0jyjGjBQvgj_jFV58cw0aNx-jUg1h1O-FQ7820k68C0X4M=@protonmail.com
Customizable names for buffers presenting search results, via two
custom variables (notmuch-search-buffer-name-format and
notmuch-saved-search-buffer-name-format), defaulting to values
currently used for plain searches and including too tree and
unthreaded search buffers.
Amended by db: spelling fix.
Initially only use in notmuch-hello-insert-alltags. This is a more
narrow resolution of [1], which (unlike [2]) does not disable exclude
processing for regular saved searches.
[1]: id:87wox1vovj.fsf@len.workgroup
[2]: id:20220105010606.2034601-2-david@tethera.net
Revert commit 8370e3cfe2, and remark the
corresponding test as broken. Also update the expected output of the
broken test to show excludes active in the user defined saved searches.
Commit [0] left the stemmer object accessible, but did not add
de-allocation code to notmuch_database_destroy. This commit corrects
that oversight.
Leak originally reported by Austin Ray [1].
[0]: 3202e0d1fe
[1]: id:20220105224538.m36lnjn7rf3ieonc@athena
In [1] Austin Ray reported some memory leaks in
notmuch_database_open. One of those leaks is caused by jumping to the
next key without freeing val. This change avoids that leak.
[1]: id:20220105224538.m36lnjn7rf3ieonc@athena
In particular tags that only occur on otherwise excluded messages do
not show up in "All tags" without this change. The reported numbers
_do_ take excludes into account, so it is possible that
searches (e.g. the aformentioned tags) will show up with a count of
zero.
Gregor Zattler observed that tags could be unintentionally hidden in
the "All tags" view, and Tomi Ollia worked out [2] that the issue was tags
that only occured on excluded messages. This test reproduces that bug.
[1]: id:87wox1vovj.fsf@len.workgroup
[2]: id:m28t9faaim.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi
Although it makes sense for the extra headers to be added to the copy
of the message headers included in the sexp/json, it is a bit
surprising for them to show in the new message constructed for the
reply, especially when, as here, they are always missing/empty.
This is based on a patch from Johan Parin [1], which is in turn
responding to a bug report / feature requiest from Jan Malkhovski.
The update to the structured output documented in schemata is intended
to be upward compatible, so the format version stays the same
[1]: id:20191116162723.18343-1-johan.parin@gmail.com
[2]: id:87h8sdemnr.fsf@oxij.org
We already use an allocated (and presumably open) database as a talloc
context. Keeping the pointer in the allocated struct will allow us to
e.g. interrogate the configuration in a sprinter function without
threading the database all the way through the various levels of function.
Since the bug was first reported in [1], notmuch has gained the
ability to have the database located outside the mail root, hence this
this change differs slightly from Jani's proposed solution [2] in not
using notmuch_database_get_path, but rather the already retrieved
mail_root.
[1]: id:87mwhifu9a.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org
[2]: id:87ios5v59p.fsf@nikula.org
In [1] Rob observed that notmuch new ignored directories called
.notmuch everywhere in the tree, where they should only (and now, with
split configs, at most) be ignored at the top level. Add a test to
demonstrate the problem.
[1]: id:87mwhifu9a.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org
If we know the configuration is split, but there is no mail root
defined, this indicates a (lack of) configuration error. Currently
this can only arise in XDG configurations.
