I think one configuration group for each top-level command makes a lot
of sense. And this makes the existing naming of set_new_tags and
get_new_tags also very reasonable.
Our intent has always been that when new configuration-file settings
are created by notmuch, that they get created with comments telling
the user how to use them. But this was only working before when the
entire configuration file was created.
We fix this so that when a new group is added, (such as the recently-
added [messages] section) that it gets its documentation.
Add a new_tags option in the [messages] section of the configuration
file to allow the user to specify which tags should be added to new
messages by notmuch new.
No more .hg files needed in the git repo.
No stock notmuch-test suite needed in a subdirectory.
We have the real one in this repository
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>
The test suite doesn't yet cover --format=json output nor UTF-8 in
subject or body.
This patch starts with test cases for 'search --format=json' and
'show --format=json'.
Furthermore, it has test cases for a search for a UTF-8 string in a mail
body for a UTF-8 string in a mail subject.
Finally, it has a test case for --format=json with UTF-8 messages,
demonstrating the fix in 1267697893-sup-4538@sam.mediasupervision.de.
Reviewed-by: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>
Updated tests to current implementation of the test suite.
These tests demonstrate a bug in the current implementation
of "notmuch show --format=json", (timestamp output is changed
depending on current timezone).
If future updates to the test suite add more messages to the database
before this "notmuch show" test, then the message-ID numbers in the
expected output will all change. But we can at least compute the
numbers so that this test will continue to pass.
With defcustom the user can easily find this variable (and its
documentation) within "M-x customize-group" "notmuch" (though finding
*that* is still tricky).
The new name of notmuch-poll-script is also easier to remember, (for
me at least).
Emacs scoping rules strongly encourage us to have fully-namespaced
function names. A prefix like "notmuch-search" is a pretty ugly
namespace name, but it's what we have for now.
The new functions first check if an external poll script has been defined in
the variable 'notmuch-external-refresh-script and if yes, runs that script
before executing the existing refresh function (which is bound to '=')
This can be used to have 'G' mimic the mutt behavior of polling an external
mail server - or if the mail polling is already automatic, it can trigger
the call to notmuch new and any necessary automatic tagging of new email.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <hohndel@infradead.org>
In the recent change to rename threads based on changing subject
lines, I broke message ordering within "notmuch show" output. But our
test suite didn't catch that regressions, because we didn't have any
tests of "notmuch show".
This adds one "notmuch show" test along with the thread-naming
tests. It's not a whole suite of "notmuch show" testing, but it does
catch this regression at least.
We're starting to get test output that's fairly long, so it's much
kinder to just show a diff rather than displaying the complete
expected and actual output. To allow the user to investigate things
after the fact, we save the expected and actual output to files named
test-${test_number}.expected and test-${test_number}.output .
Sebastian offered to maintain these bindings within the notmuch
repository and offered them in the following repository:
git://github.com/spaetz/python-notmuch.git
These are the bindings formerly known as "cnotmuch" and now known
simply as "notmuch" from within python.
The bindings are not yet integrated into the build system and
packaging of the primary ntomuch repository.
As the user has already defined aliases for certain searches in
notmuch-folders, search buffer names that use these aliases will
be easier to identify.
It's not neccessary to sort the results before we apply tags. Xapian
contributor Olly Betts says that savings might be bigger with a cold
file cache and (as unsorted implies really sorted by document id) a better
cache locality when applying tags to messages.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>
Previously, we always sorted the returned results by some string value,
(newest-to-oldest by default), however in some cases (as when applying
tags to a search result) we are not interested in any special order.
This introduces a NOTMUCH_SORT_UNSORTED value that does just that. It is
not used at the moment anywhere in the code.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>
When there is no configuration file at all, (and none specified),
notmuch works correctly by assuming correct default values. But when
the user specifies a configuration file (with the NOTMUCH_CONFIG
environment variable) and that file doesn't exist, then notmuch should
aboirt and let the user know about the problem.
The thread-naming feature depends on the matched messages being passed
down in a precise order, (the order of the top-level search). We fix
the feature by passing that sort order down.
We recently added a feature to name threads based on the messages that
actually matched the search, (as opposed to simply the oldest or
newest message in the thread whether it matched or not). So add tests
for that, and (surprise, surprise!) the feature does not entirely
work.
We know that matched messages are always added in order, so we can
always just grab the subject from the first message. This is the same
approach that was used previously in _thread_add_message. That is, the
recent feature of renaming a thread based on the subject of the
"first" matched message is as simple as moving the subject assignment
from _thread_add_message to _thread_add_matched_message.
At the moment all threads are named based on the name of the first message
in the thread. However, this can cause problems if people either start
new threads by replying-all (as unfortunately, many out there do) or
change the subject of their mails to reflect a shift in a thread on a
list.
This patch names threads based on (a) matches for the query, and (b) the
search order. If the search order is oldest-first (as in the default
inbox) it chooses the oldest matching message as the subject. If the
search order is newest-first it chooses the newest one.
Reply prefixes ("Re: ", "Aw: ", "Sv: ", "Vs: ") are ignored
(case-insensitively) so a Re: won't change the subject.
Note that this adds a "sort" argument to _notmuch_thread_create and
_thread_add_matched_message, so that when constructing the thread we can
be aware of the sort order.
Signed-off-by: Jesse Rosenthal <jrosenthal@jhu.edu>
This way when GMime 2.8 comes out we can simply add it to the list
rather than adding an additional block of conditional code for it.
Also GMime 2.6 is now preferred over GMime 2.4.
This patch helps in customizing search result display similar to
mutt's index_format. The customization is done by defining an alist as
below:
(setq notmuch-search-result-format '(("date" . "%s ")
("authors" . "%-40s ")
("subject" . "%s ")))
The supported keywords are date, count, authors, subject and tags.
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>
Use the mailcap functionality to guess a MIME type for attachments of
type application/octet-stream and, presuming successful, feed the
attachment back into the display code with the determine type.
This is mostly useless at the moment, as the JSON output from notmuch
does not include the content of application/octet-stream parts, so
they cannot be displayed even if the guess is a good one.
If a text/plain part is not the first part in a message, add a label
in order that a user can see that multiple parts are present.
If a part has a 'filename' attribute, include it in any label
describing the part.
In the recent switch to a JSON-based emacs interface, RET now toggles
message visibility anywhere in the message, (rather than only on the
summary line). So we no longer need this separate "b" binding for this.
Additionally, the body toggle was implemented independently from RET,
so after hiding a message with "b" one could not make it visible with
RET. This confusing state is now no longer possible, (since the
:body-visible property is removed entirely).
