Commit graph

4 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Carl Worth
b6dd413903 Protect definition of _GNU_SOURCE.
I was getting a duplicate definition of this from somewhere, so
getting compiler warnings without this protection.
2009-10-19 22:34:59 -07:00
Carl Worth
371091139a Rework message parsing to use getline rather than mmap.
The line-based parsing can be a bit awkward when wanting to peek
ahead, (say, for folded header values), but it's so convenient
to be able to trust that a string terminator exists on every
line so it cleans up the code considerably.
2009-10-19 16:38:44 -07:00
Carl Worth
0e777a8f80 notmuch: Switch from gmime to custom, ad-hoc parsing of headers.
Since we're currently just trying to stitch together In-Reply-To
and References headers we don't need that much sophistication.
It's when we later add full-text searching that GMime will be
useful.

So for now, even though my own code here is surely very buggy
compared to GMime it's also a lot faster. And speed is what
we're after for the initial index creation.
2009-10-19 13:00:43 -07:00
Carl Worth
10c176ba0e notmuch: Start actually adding messages to the index.
This is the beginning of the notmuch library as well, with its
interface in notmuch.h. So far we've got create, open, close, and
add_message (all with a notmuch_database prefix).

The current add_message function has already been whittled down from
what we have in notmuch-index-message to add only references,
message-id, and thread-id to the index, (that is---just enough to do
thread-linkage but nothing for full-text searching).

The concept here is to do something quickly so that the user can get
some data into notmuch and start using it. (The most interesting stuff
is then thread-linkage and labels like inbox and unread.)  We can
defer the full-text indexing of the body of the messages for later,
(such as in the background while the user is reading mail).

The initial thread-stitching step is still slower than I would like.
We may have to stop using libgmime for this step as its overhead is
not worth it for the simple case of just parsing the message-id,
references, and in-reply-to headers.
2009-10-18 20:56:30 -07:00