The new notmuch-search-hide-excluded option allows users to configure whether
to show or hide excluded messages (as determined by search.exclude_tags
in the local notmuch config file). It defaults to true for now to maintain
backwards-compatibility with how notmuch-{search,tree} already worked.
New commands notmuch-search-toggle-hide-excluded and
notmuch-tree-toggle-exclude have also been added. They toggle the value
of notmuch-search-hide-excluded for the search in the current search or
tree buffer. It's bound to "i" in the respective keymaps for these
modes.
Lastly I've amended some calls to notmuch-tree and notmuch-unthreaded
which didn't pass through the buffer local value of
notmuch-search-oldest-first (and now notmuch-search-exclude).
Examples of where I've done this include:
+ notmuch-jump-search
+ notmuch-tree-from-search-current-query
+ notmuch-unthreaded-from-search-current-query
+ notmuch-tree-from-search-thread
A new test file for Emacs has been added which covers the usage of the
new `notmuch-search-hide-excluded' option and interactively hiding or
showing mail with excluded tags. These test cover the basic usage of
the `notmuch-search-toggle-hide-excluded' command in notmuch-search,
notmuch-tree and notmuch-unthreaded searches. These tests also cover
the persistence of the current value of the hide-excluded mail option
as a user switches from between these different search commands.
[1]: id:87ilxlxsng.fsf@kisara.moe
Amended-by: db, fix indentation in T461-emacs-search-exclude.sh
Previously we both found a database and returned a message saying that
the database could not be found (along with a success code). This
change should prevent spurious error output.
Duplicate bug reported in id:87wmtvcor5.fsf@alyssa.is
The error message is nonsense, because notmuch config list actually
includes the database in those two cases.
The function _notmuch_config_load_from_file is only called in two
places in open.cc. Update internal API to match the idiom in open.cc.
Adding a newline is needed for consistency with other status strings.
Based in part on a patch [1] from Eric Blake.
[1]: id:20230906153402.101471-1-eblake@redhat.com
This is a bit fragile w.r.t. glib changing their error message, but it
already helped me find one formatting bug, so for now I think it's
worth it, instead of just grepping for "UTF-8".
For now print a generic error message and exit with error on any
non-success code. Previously the code exited, but with exit code zero,
leading users / scripts to think the command had succeeded.
On ppc64el, races are detected by TSan:
WARNING: ThreadSanitizer: data race (pid=4520)
Read of size 8 at 0x7ffff20016c0 by thread T1:
#0 strlen ../../../../src/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_interceptors.inc:386 (libtsan.so.2+0x77c0c)
#1 strlen ../../../../src/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_interceptors.inc:378 (libtsan.so.2+0x77c0c)
#2 g_strdup ../../../glib/gstrfuncs.c:362 (libglib-2.0.so.0+0xa4ac4)
Previous write of size 8 at 0x7ffff20016c0 by thread T2:
#0 malloc ../../../../src/libsanitizer/tsan/tsan_interceptors_posix.cpp:647 (libtsan.so.2+0x471f0)
#1 g_malloc ../../../glib/gmem.c:130 (libglib-2.0.so.0+0x7bb68)
Location is heap block of size 20 at 0x7ffff20016c0 allocated by thread T2:
#0 malloc ../../../../src/libsanitizer/tsan/tsan_interceptors_posix.cpp:647 (libtsan.so.2+0x471f0)
#1 g_malloc ../../../glib/gmem.c:130 (libglib-2.0.so.0+0x7bb68)
This appears to be a false positive in GLib, as explained at
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/issues/1672#note_1831968
In short, a call to fstat fails under TSan and GLib's g_sterror will
intern the error message, which will be reused by other threads.
Since upstream appears to be aware that GLib doesn't play nicely with
TSan, suppress everything coming from the library instead of
maintaining a fine grained list.
Reported at
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=notmuch&arch=ppc64el&ver=0.38%7Erc0-1&stamp=1692959868&raw=0
Native compilation is kindof useless in the test suite because we
throw away the cache after every subtest. The test suite could in
principle share an eln cache within a given test file; for now try to
minimize the amount of native-compilation. There is an intermittent
bug where emacs loses track of its default-directory; I suspect (but
have no proof) that bug is related to native compilation and/or race
conditions. This patch seems to prevent that bug (or at least reduce
its frequency).
As of Emacs 29.1, In-Reply-To is in the default value for
message-hidden-headers. We actually want to see that in the test
suite, so remove it again. To future proof the tests, fix a default
value for message-hidden-headers specifically for the test suite.
We put some effort into testing the built copy rather than some
installed copy. On the other hand for people like packagers, testing
the installed copy is also of interest.
When NOTMUCH_TEST_INSTALLED is set to a nonempty value, tests do not
require a built notmuch tree or running configure.
Some of the tests marked as broken when running against installed
notmuch are probably fixable.
When running the test suite without building first, it is desirable to
have the tests consider these variables being undefined as equivalent
to the feature not being present, and in particular for the tests not
to generate errors.
According to my reading of RFC5322, there is an obsolete syntax for
Message-Id which permits folding whitespace (i.e. to be removed /
ignored by parsers). In [1] Paul Wise observed that notmuch removed
whitespace on indexing, but does not do any corresponding
normalization of queries. Mark the latter as a bug by adding a failing
test.
[1]: id:20230409044143.4041560-1-pabs3@bonedaddy.net
This replaces two instances of Xapian::Query::MatchAll with the
equivalent but thread-safe alternative Xapian::Query(std::string()).
Xapian::Query::MatchAll maintains an internal pointer to a refcounted
Xapian::Internal::QueryTerm.
None of this is thread-safe but that wouldn't be an issue if
Xapian::Query::MatchAll wasn't static. Because it's static, the
refcounting goes awry when Notmuch is called from multiple threads.
This is actually documented by Xapian:
4715de3a9f/xapian-core/include/xapian/query.h (L65)
While static, Xapian::Query::MatchNothing is safe because it doesn't
maintain an internal object and as such, doesn't use references.
Two best-effort tests making use of TSan were added to showcase the
issue (I couldn't figure out a way to deterministically reproduce it
without making an unmaintainable mess).
First, when two databases are created in parallel, a query that uses
Xapian::Query::MatchAll is made (lib/query.cc), resulting in the
following backtrace on a segfault:
#0 0x00007ffff76822af in Xapian::Query::get_terms_begin (this=0x7fffe80137f0) at api/query.cc:141
#1 0x00007ffff7f933f5 in _notmuch_query_cache_terms (query=0x7fffe80137c0) at lib/query.cc:176
#2 0x00007ffff7f93784 in _notmuch_query_ensure_parsed_xapian (query=0x7fffe80137c0) at lib/query.cc:225
#3 0x00007ffff7f9381a in _notmuch_query_ensure_parsed (query=0x7fffe80137c0) at lib/query.cc:260
#4 0x00007ffff7f93bfe in _notmuch_query_search_documents (query=0x7fffe80137c0, type=0x7ffff7fa9b1e "mail", out=0x7ffff666da18) at lib/query.cc:361
#5 0x00007ffff7f93ba4 in notmuch_query_search_messages (query=0x7fffe80137c0, out=0x7ffff666da18) at lib/query.cc:349
#6 0x00007ffff7f83d98 in notmuch_database_upgrade (notmuch=0x7fffe8000bd0, progress_notify=0x0, closure=0x0) at lib/database.cc:934
#7 0x00007ffff7fa110f in notmuch_database_create_with_config (database_path=0x7ffff666dcb0 "/tmp/notmuch.MZ2AGr", config_path=0x7ffff7faab3c "", profile=0x0, database=0x0, status_string=0x7ffff666dc90) at lib/open.cc:754
#8 0x00007ffff7fa0d6f in notmuch_database_create_verbose (path=0x7ffff666dcb0 "/tmp/notmuch.MZ2AGr", database=0x0, status_string=0x7ffff666dc90) at lib/open.cc:653
#9 0x00007ffff7fa0ceb in notmuch_database_create (path=0x7ffff666dcb0 "/tmp/notmuch.MZ2AGr", database=0x0) at lib/open.cc:637
...
Second, some queries would make use of Xapian::Query::MatchAll
(lib/regexp-fields.cc), resulting in the following backtrace on a
segfault:
#0 0x00007f629828b690 in Xapian::Internal::QueryBranch::gather_terms (this=0x7f628800def0, void_terms=0x7f629726d5a0) at api/queryinternal.cc:1245
#1 0x00007f629828c260 in Xapian::Internal::QueryScaleWeight::gather_terms (this=0x7f628800df70, void_terms=0x7f629726d5a0) at api/queryinternal.cc:1434
#2 0x00007f629828b69f in Xapian::Internal::QueryBranch::gather_terms (this=0x7f628800dd90, void_terms=0x7f629726d5a0) at api/queryinternal.cc:1245
#3 0x00007f6298282571 in Xapian::Query::get_unique_terms_begin (this=0x7f628800dcd8) at api/query.cc:166
#4 0x00007f629841a59b in Xapian::Weight::Internal::accumulate_stats (this=0x7f628800dca0, subdb=..., rset=...) at weight/weightinternal.cc:86
#5 0x00007f62983c15ba in LocalSubMatch::prepare_match (this=0x7f628800df20, nowait=true, total_stats=...) at matcher/localsubmatch.cc:172
#6 0x00007f62983c8fcc in prepare_sub_matches (leaves=std::vector of length 1, capacity 1 = {...}, stats=...) at matcher/multimatch.cc:237
#7 0x00007f62983c98a3 in MultiMatch::MultiMatch (this=0x7f629726d9a0, db_=..., query_=..., qlen=3, omrset=0x0, collapse_max_=0, collapse_key_=4294967295, percent_cutoff_=0, weight_cutoff_=0, order_=Xapian::Enquire::ASCENDING, sort_key_=0, sort_by_=Xapian::Enquire::Internal::VAL, sort_value_forward_=true, time_limit_=0, stats=..., weight_=0x7f6288008d50, matchspies_=std::vector of length 0, capacity 0, have_sorter=false, have_mdecider=false) at matcher/multimatch.cc:353
#8 0x00007f629826fcba in Xapian::Enquire::Internal::get_mset (this=0x7f628800e0b0, first=0, maxitems=0, check_at_least=0, rset=0x0, mdecider=0x0) at api/omenquire.cc:569
#9 0x00007f629827181c in Xapian::Enquire::get_mset (this=0x7f629726db80, first=0, maxitems=0, check_at_least=0, rset=0x0, mdecider=0x0) at api/omenquire.cc:937
#10 0x00007f6298be529a in _notmuch_query_search_documents (query=0x7f6288009750, type=0x7f6298bfaafe "mail", out=0x7f629726dcc0) at lib/query.cc:447
#11 0x00007f6298be4ae8 in notmuch_query_search_messages (query=0x7f6288009750, out=0x7f629726dcc0) at lib/query.cc:349
...
Printing Xapian::Query::MatchAll->internal.px->_refs in these
circumstances can help quickly identifying this scenario.
This is motivated by some test frameworks (like Rust's Cargo) that
runs unit tests in parallel and would easily encounter this issue,
unless client code gates every call to Notmuch behind a lock.
This is what can be expected from the tests when they fail:
== stderr ==
+==================
+WARNING: ThreadSanitizer: data race (pid=207931)
+ Read of size 1 at 0x7b10000001a0 by thread T2:
+ #0 memcpy <null> (libtsan.so.2+0x62506)
+ #1 void std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_construct<char*>(char*, char*, std::forward_iterator_tag) [clone .isra.0] <null> (libxapian.so.30+0x872b3)
+
+ Previous write of size 8 at 0x7b10000001a0 by thread T1:
+ #0 operator new(unsigned long) <null> (libtsan.so.2+0x8ba83)
+ #1 Xapian::Query::Query(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&, unsigned int, unsigned int) <null> (libxapian.so.30+0x855cd)
...
_notmuch_message_remove_all_properties wasn't syncing the message back
to the database but was still invalidating the metadata, giving the
impression the properties had actually been removed.
Also move the metadata invalidation to _notmuch_message_remove_terms
to be closer to what's done in _notmuch_message_modify_property and
_notmuch_message_remove_term.
notmuch_message_remove_all_properties should have removed the
testkey1 = testvalue1
property but hasn't. Delay the execution of the corresponding test
to avoid updating a few tests that actually relied on the broken
behavior.
These two functions don't fail gracefully when editing a removed
message:
BROKEN edit property on removed message without uncaught exception
--- T610-message-property.20.EXPECTED 2023-02-27 11:33:25.792764376 +0000
+++ T610-message-property.20.OUTPUT 2023-02-27 11:33:25.793764381 +0000
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
== stdout ==
== stderr ==
+terminate called after throwing an instance of 'Xapian::DocNotFoundError'
The other functions appear to be safe.
Previously we just crashed with an internal error. With this change,
the caller can handle it better. Update notmuch-new so that it doesn't
crash with "unknown error code" because of this change.
With this mode, one can fold trees in the notmuch-tree buffer as if
they were outlines, using all the commands provided by
outline-minor-mode. We also define a couple of movement commands
that, optional, will ensure that only the thread around point is
unfolded.
The implementation is based on registering a :level property in the
messages p-list, that is then used by outline-minor-mode to to
recognise headers.
Amended by db: Copy docstring to manual and edit for presentation. Add
two tests. Fix typo "wether".
The call to delete_document can throw exceptions (and can happen in
practice [1]), so catch the exception and extract the error
message. As a side effect, also move the call to _n_m_has_term inside
the try/catch. This should not change anything as that function
already traps any Xapian exceptions.
[1]: id:wwuk039sk2p.fsf@chaotikum.eu
In [1], Thomas Schneider reported an uncaught Xapian exception when
running out of disk space. We generate the same exception via database
corruption.
[1]: id:wwuk039sk2p.fsf@chaotikum.eu
notmuch search does not output header values. However, when browsing
through a large email corpus, it can be time saving to be able to
paginate without running notmuch show for each message/thread.
Add --offset and --limit options to notmuch show. This is inspired from
commit 796b629c3b ("cli: add options --offset and --limit to notmuch
search").
Update man page, shell completion and add a test case to ensure it works
as expected.
Cc: Tim Culverhouse <tim@timculverhouse.com>
Cc: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Robin Jarry <robin@jarry.cc>
This replaces the old OpenPGPv4 key that is used in the test suite
with a more modern OpenPGPv4 key. All cryptographic artifacts in the
test suite are updated accordingly.
Having old cryptographic artifacts in the test suite presents a
problem once the old algorithms are rejected by contemporary
implementations.
For reference, this is the old key.
sec rsa1024 2011-02-05 [SC]
5AEAB11F5E33DCE875DDB75B6D92612D94E46381
uid [ unknown] Notmuch Test Suite <test_suite@notmuchmail.org> (INSECURE!)
ssb rsa1024 2011-02-05 [E]
And this is the new key. Note that is has the same shape, but uses
Ed25519 and Cv25519 instead of 1024-bit RSA.
sec ed25519 2022-09-07 [SC]
9A3AFE6C60065A148FD4B58A7E6ABE924645CC60
uid [ultimate] Notmuch Test Suite (INSECURE!) <test_suite@notmuchmail.org>
ssb cv25519 2022-09-07 [E]
The general problem of indexing attachments requires some help to turn
things into text, but (most?) text/* should be doable internally,
possibly with optimizations as for the text/html case.
The corpus is not really suitable for general indexing test since the
sole message is ignored (and will most likely continue to be ignored)
by notmuch-new.
By sharing the existing logic used by the sexp query parser, this
allows negative lastmod revisions to be interpreted as relative to the
most recent revision.
There is some duplication of code here, but not all of the locations
valid to find a database make sense to create. Furthermore we nead two
passes, so the control flow in _choose_database_path would get a bit
convoluted.
The failing "create database" test replicates a bug reported by Sean
Whitton [1]. The other two failures also look related to the database
being (re)created in the wrong place.
[1]: id:87y1wqkw13.fsf@athena.silentflame.com.
The existing database creation (via add_email_corpus) was always done
in the traditional configuration. The use of xapian-metadata is just
to portably ensure that there is a database created where we expect
there to be.
