These are intended to included in the sphinx manual for notmuch-emacs.
The stamp file makes it easier to depend on the docstrings from other
parts of the build
This small library is intended to support batch extraction of Emacs
Lisp docstrings from source files. Clients will need to include (or
replace) rstdoc.rsti.
When generating a reply message, if the user was the originator and
only recipient of the original message, include the user as a
recipient of the reply.
When filtering by tags in notmuch-search-filter-by-tag, only return tags
related to the current query.
Before, it was returning all tags. There's no reason to refine the
current query with tags that don't exist in the current result set.
Signed-off-by: William Casarin <jb55@jb55.com>
Without this patch, gcc 8.2.0-7 complains:
debugger.c: In function ‘debugger_is_active’:
debugger.c:40:24: warning: passing argument 2 to restrict-qualified parameter aliases with argument 1 [-Wrestrict]
if (readlink (buf, buf, sizeof (buf)) != -1 &&
~~~ ^~~
This is pretty silly, but it seems simplest to just avoid passing the
same buffer to readlink as both pathname and buf.
Use explicit labels for GTypeInfo member initializers, rather than
relying on comments and ordering. This is both easier to read, and
harder to screw up. This also makes it clear that we're mis-casting
GObject class initializers for gcc.
Without this patch, g++ 8.2.0-7 produces this warning:
CXX -g -O2 lib/index.o
lib/index.cc: In function ‘GMimeFilter* notmuch_filter_discard_non_term_new(GMimeContentType*)’:
lib/index.cc:252:23: warning: cast between incompatible function types from ‘void (*)(NotmuchFilterDiscardNonTermClass*)’ {aka ‘void (*)(_NotmuchFilterDiscardNonTermClass*)’} to ‘GClassInitFunc’ {aka ‘void (*)(void*, void*)’} [-Wcast-function-type]
(GClassInitFunc) notmuch_filter_discard_non_term_class_init,
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The definition of GClassInitFunc in
/usr/include/glib-2.0/gobject/gtype.h suggests that this function will
always be called with the class_data member of the GTypeInfo. We set
that value to NULL in both GObject definitions in notmuch. So we mark
it as explicitly unused.
There is no functional change here, just code cleanup.
`mm-inline-text-html-with-images' was removed from mm-decode.el in
2016 and replaced with `mm-html-inhibit-images'.
`gnus-select-frame-set-input-focus' was removed from gnus-util.el in
2016 and existed only for XEmacs compatibility.
b31e44c678 introduced message-id-parse
as a new binary created by the test suite. It shows up as something
additional to git, but git ought to know to ignore it.
This adds completion files for zsh that cover most of notmuch's cli.
The files in completion/zsh are formatted so that they can be found by
zsh's completion system if put $fpath. They are also registered to the
notmuch-* pattern, so they can be called externally using _dispatch.
Update installation recipe and drop debian/notmuch.examples to avoid
breakage. This means zsh completion is not installed for debian, to be
fixed in a future commit.
Amended by db: use regexp searching for address completion. This seems
to be fast enough to work without a cache.
The main goal here is to be able to install the notmuch-mutt script
with an absolute shebang. I have tried to make the notmuch-mutt
Makefile use configure information from notmuch if available, but make
suitable guesses if not.
If the database path specified in the configuration file does *not*
start with a /, presume that it is relative to $HOME and modify the
path used to open the database accordingly.
In current Debian sid / testing, emacs25 is a transitional package,
and emacs-gtk, emacs-lucid, and emacs-nox are the real packages.
Emacs 23 is not available in emacs after oldoldstable.
As reported by Sean Whitton, there are mailers (in particular the
Debian Bug Tracking System) that have sensible In-Reply-To headers,
but un-useful-for-notmuch References (in particular with the BTS, the
oldest reference is last). I looked at a sample of about 200K
messages, and only about 0.5% these had something other than a single
message-id in In-Reply-To. On this basis, if we see a single
message-id in In-Reply-To, consider that as authoritative.
