This commit introduces a new 'unthreaded' search mode where each
matching message is shown on a separate line. It shares almost all of
its code with tree view. Subsequent commits will allow it to diverge
slightly in appearance.
This adds a --unthreaded option to notmuch show to tell it to return
the matching messages in an unthreaded order (so just by date).
To make it easier for users, in particular for notmuch-tree.el, we
output each message with the same "nesting" as if it were an entire
thread in its own right.
amended by db: s/status= /status = /
Apparently doxygen needs its comments formatted in a specific way to
notice that the group is closed.
Without this fix, with doxygen 1.8.16-2 we see:
```
doxygen ./doc/doxygen.cfg
…/notmuch/lib/notmuch.h:2322: warning: end of file while inside a group
```
Signed-off-by: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
GMIME_ENCRYPT_NONE and GMIME_VERIFY_NONE have the same value, but they
are different enumerated types. So in C, this is a cosmetic change,
but it is technically correct if we only had stricter typing.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
crypto.gpg_path was only used when we built against gmime versions
before 3.0. Since we now depend on gmime 3.0.3 or later, it is
meaningless.
The removal of the field from the _notmuch_config struct would be an
ABI change if that struct were externally exposed, but it is not, so
it's safe to unilaterally remove it.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
In particular, timestamps beyond 2038 could overflow the sprinter
interface on systems where time_t is 64-bit but 'int' is a signed 32-bit
integer type.
The escaping in the description of the output of "notmuch-config list"
appears to have been inherited from some previous attempts at
documentation. It leaked out in the actual generated manpage
documentation, where it looks like this:
list Every configuration item is printed to stdout, each on a
separate line of the form:
*section*.\ *item*\ =\ *value*
This simplification cleans up the overescaping.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
See lintian informational tag
symbols-file-missing-build-depends-package-field for hints about this
minor metadata update.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
It causes this function to fail with:
let: Wrong type argument: null, t
Support for this was removed from Emacs in April
2019 (5c5e309527e6b582e2c04b83e7af45f3144863ac) because it never
worked correctly (apparently).
This also shouldn't be necessary as sentinels will not be called
unless emacs is idle or waiting for input. Therefore, the
`process-put' calls immediately following the `make-process' call
should always complete before the sentinel is first called.
These tests were an attempt to establish that the content of the
"Legacy Display" part is the same as the actual protected headers of
the message. But this is more conservative than we need to be.
https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-autocrypt-lamps-protected-headers-02.html
section 5.3 makes clear that the Legacy Display part is purely
decorative, and section 5.2.1 clarifies that the detection can be done
purely by MIME structure and Content-Type alone.
Furthermore, now that we're accepting text/plain Legacy Display parts,
it's not clear the lines in the Legacy Display part should be
interpreted as needing an exact string match (e.g. "real" headers are
likely to be RFC 2047 encoded, but the text/plain Legacy Display part
probably should not be).
The concerns that motivated this test in the past were twofold: that
we might accidentally hide some information from the reader of the
message that they should have available to them, or that we could
introduce a covert channel that would be invisible to other clients.
I no longer think these are significant concerns:
a) There will be no accidental misidentification of a Legacy Display
part. The identification of the Legacy Display part is
unambiguous due to MIME structure and Content-Type. MIME
structure MUST be the first child part of a two-part
multipart/mixed Cryptographic Payload. And the
protected-headers=v1 content-type parameter must be present on
both the cryptographic payload and the legacy display part, so no
one would accidentally generate this structure and have it be
accidentally matched.
b) As for creating a covert channel, many such channels already
exist. For example, non-standard e-mail headers, custom MIME
types, unusual MIME structures, etc, all make it possible to ship
some content in a message that will be visible in some MUAs but
not in others. This doesn't make the situation demonstrably
worse.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-autocrypt-lamps-protected-headers-02.html
Makes it clear that the "Legacy Display" part of an encrypted message
with protected headers can (and indeed, should) be of content-type
text/plain, though some clients still generate the Legacy Display part
as content-type text/rfc822-headers. Notmuch should recognize the
part whichever of the two content-types it uses.
See also discussion in
https://github.com/autocrypt/protected-headers/issues/23 for why the
community of implementers is moving in the direction of text/plain.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
Another fix to the docstrings, this time for the English part of the
docstrings, not the Python class name. No functional changes here.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
Rather than ship from the source directories, ship these files from
where they're installed by "make install".
This doesn't resolve all the dh_missing warnings yet (due to #946142),
but it leaves the last bit of that problem in the hands of the dh-elpa
package, and it's not due to notmuch's packaging any longer.
Note that notmuch-pkg.el is only relevant for elpa, so it was not
installed by "make install", and has to be extracted deliberately from
the source tree.
Note also that we now don't ship make-deps.el or rstdoc.el, as these
are build tools and don't belong in the deployed package.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
This was being shipped by "make install", but we weren't shipping it
in the debian package. Thanks to dh_missing for noticing!
Signed-off-by: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
This commit changes the behaviour of notmuch-mua-attachment-check
so that it stops searching for notmuch-mua-attachment-regexp when a
new mime-part is reached. This avoids false warnings when matching
words occur inside forwarded messages.
Rather than blocking emacs while gpg does its' thing, by default run
key retrieval asynchronously, possibly updating the display of the
message on successful completion.
In case zlib not found by pkg-config(1) the pkg-config information
is resolved by attempting to print ZLIB_VERSION from from zlib
installation if it exists anyway.
If above done successfully compat/zlib.pc is written for forthcoming
pkg-config execution.
Since `set -u` is in effect (since 124a67e96, 2016-05-06),
expanding unset $PKG_CONFIG_PATH (would have) failed whenever tried.
Now it is changed to set as "$PKG_CONFIG_PATH:compat" if PKG_CONFIG_PATH
is set and is non-empty string, plain "compat" otherwise.
Zsh searches in the $fpath array for completion functions. By default
this includes $(prefix)/share/zsh/site-functions but not the existing
value. The prefix for zsh and notmuch isn't guaranteed to be the same
but it normally will be making this a better default for
zsh_completion_dir.
I was supposed to amend the original patch that added this function,
but somehow I botched that. The original version runs, so make an
extra commit for the tidying.
This moves away from the deprecated notmuch_database_add_message API
and instead uses the notmuch_database_index_file API. This means
instroducing a class to manage the index options and bumping the
library version requirement to 5.1.
This add the notmuch version and absolute path of the binary used
in the pytest header. This is nice when running the tests
interactively as you get confirmation you're testing the version you
thought you were testing.
The entire python-cffi test suite is considered as a single test at
the level of the notmuch test suite. This might or might not be ideal,
but it gets them run.
