==22884== ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow on address 0x601600008291 at pc 0x7ff6295680e5 bp 0x7fff4ab9aa40 sp 0x7fff4ab9aa08
READ of size 1 at 0x601600008291 thread T0
#0 0x7ff6295680e4 in __interceptor_strcmp ??:?
#1 0x44763b in _thread_add_message /home/todd/.apps/notmuch/lib/thread.cc:255
#2 0x4459e8 in notmuch_threads_get /home/todd/.apps/notmuch/lib/query.cc:496
#3 0x41e2a7 in do_search_threads /home/todd/.apps/notmuch/notmuch-search.c:131
#4 0x40a408 in main /home/todd/.apps/notmuch/notmuch.c:345
#5 0x7ff627cb9ec4 in __libc_start_main /build/buildd/eglibc-2.19/csu/libc-start.c:287
#6 0x40abf3 in _start ??:?
0x601600008291 is located 0 bytes to the right of 97-byte region [0x601600008230,0x601600008291)
allocated by thread T0 here:
#0 0x7ff62956e41a in malloc ??:?
#1 0x7ff628b8ab5d in talloc_strdup ??:?
The TAB-initiated address completion generates completion candidates
synchronously, blocking the UI. Since this can take long time, it is
better to let the use know what's happening.
At the moment, the test-lib fills in any missing headers. This makes
it impossible to test our handling of empty subjects. This will
allow us to use a special dummy subject -- `@FORCE_EMPTY` -- to force
the subject to remain empty.
Currently the thread is named based on either the oldest or newest
matching message (depending on the search order). If this message has
an empty subject, though, the thread will show up with an empty
subject in the search results. (See the thread starting with
`id:1412371140-21051-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net` for an
example.)
This changes the behavior so it will use a non-empty name for the
thread if possible. We name threads based on (a) non-empty matches for
the query, and (b) the search order. If the search order is
oldest-first (as in the default inbox) it chooses the oldest matching
non-empty message as the subject. If the search order is newest-first
it chooses the newest one.
Make a new customizable variable instead of relying on
message-cite-function because the default for the latter changed
between emacs releases.
The defcustom is borrowed from the message.el source, with minor
modifications.
The faces used when washing messages should be notmuch specific and
inherit from the underlying emacs face rather than using it
directly. This allows the washed face to be modified without requiring
the modification of the underlying face.
Currently we hardcode "python" in several places. This makes things
hard for people who have only commands called python3 and/or
python2. We also add the name to sh.config to eventually replace the
current workaround in the test suite.
As discussed in
id:8cc9dd580ad672527e12f43706f9803b2c8e99d8.1405220724.git.wking@tremily.us,
execfile is unavailable in python3.
The approach of this commit avoids modifying the python module path,
which is arguably preferable since it avoids potentially accidentally
importing a module from the wrong place.
Tamas Szakaly points out [1] that the bug fixed in 51b073c still
exists in at least one place. This change follows the suggestion of
[2] and creates a block scope temporary std::string to avoid the rules
of iterators temporaries.
[1]: id:20141226113755.GA64154@pamparam
[2]: id:20141226230655.GA41992@pamparam
We generally do not support mbox files, but for historical reasons
we've supported single-message mbox files, with a deprecation
message. We've tried dropping the support altogether, but backed out
of it because we'd need to stop indexing them, while keeping support
for previously indexed files. This would be more complicated than
simply supporting single-message mbox files. Therefore, drop the
deprecation message, and just silently accept single-message mboxes.
Currently, if a From-header is of the form:
"" <address@example.com>
the empty string will be treated as a valid real-name, and the entry
in the search results will be empty.
The new behavior here is that we treat an empty real-name field as if
it were null, so that the email address will be used in the search
results instead.
Signed-off-by: Jesse Rosenthal <jrosenthal@jhu.edu>
We test for whether a quoted empty email address
"" <address@example.com>
will show up as the address, instead of the empty string. This is
marked as known-broken, since the current behavior is to use the empty
string.
This is a new test file, since handling of unusual email addresses
doesn't seem to fit well in any of our existing tests.
Signed-off-by: Jesse Rosenthal <jrosenthal@jhu.edu>
`with-current-notmuch-show-message' applies a `no-conversion' coding
system when reading a raw message from notmuch. That coding system
should _not_ be applied when the body of the macro is evaluated, as it
can cause file operations used during that evaluation to incorrectly
apply the `no-conversion' coding system.
This was discovered when a user's .signature file contained non-ASCII
characters. When a message is forwarded, the `no-conversion' coding
system was applied to the reading of the .signature file, resulting in
raw rather than UTF-8 interpretation of the data.
notmuch-deliver has no commits for about 2.5 years. notmuch-insert has
all the features that deliver does, and as far as I understand the
error handling has now caught up.
News for
- cli: add support for notmuch search --duplicate=N with --output=messages
- cli/insert: add post-insert hook
- cli/insert: require succesful message indexing for success statu
When no --output option were given, change default to display senders
only.
When only --count option is given, display senders (in contrary to not
displaying anything).
Document that --count with --sort=**order** is not supported option
combination.
Clean up some whitespace in the documentation.
One test updated to have --output=count without sender nor recipient
output option.
Changed one tab in doc/man1/notmuch-show.rst to 8 spaces.
Removed one leading tab in doc/man5/notmuch-hooks.rst to make
the SYNOPSIS style consistent with other pages.
This filters out duplicate addresses from address command output.
It also also adds tests for the address command.
The code here is an extended version of a patch from Jani Nikula.
Now, when address related outputs are in a separate command, it makes
no sense to combine multiple --output options in search command line.
Using switch statement to handle different outputs is more readable
than a series of if statements.
