The idea here is that we want to deprecate the use of arguments to
dump and restore to specify paths, since in particular we want to use
the non-option arguments to dump to form a query.
The first test tests that the notmuch-show-refresh-view function
produces the exact same output for an unmodified show buffer. This
test should pass since the relevant functionality has already been
applied.
The second test tests show refresh for a show buffer that has been
modified by navigation and message visibility toggling. Ideally
refresh-view should preserve this state of the notmuch-show buffer.
Unfortunately it currently does not, so this test is know to be broken
and is marked as such.
There's no reason to output "Non-text part:" lines for parts that are
not leaf nodes, eg. multipart/* and message/rfc822. We fix the text
here to test for their absence. The next patch will fix reply
accordingly.
The setup is useless if gdb is not present, so it doesn't hurt to skip
it. The diff here is huge, but the commit is really just moving most
of the script inside the initial if, and adding an else block to print
a warning.
This addresses atomicity of tag synchronization, the last atomicity
problems in notmuch new. Each message add or remove is wrapped in its
own atomic section, so interrupting notmuch new doesn't lose progress.
This tests notmuch new's ability to recover from arbitrary stopping
failures. It interrupts notmuch new after every database commit and,
on every resulting database snapshot, re-runs notmuch new to
completion and checks that the final database state is invariant.
This means that test_subtest_known_broken needs to be called before
every known broken subtest, which is no different than what is
documented for the test_begin_subtest case.
The assumption is that every test ends up calling either skipping,
calling test_ok_ or test_failure_ and and the latter in turn delegate
to the known_broken versions in the case where
test_subtest_known_broken_ is set.
Human-friendly scenario:
* open a thread where a message which ends with an HTML part is
followed by another message
* make the first message visible
* goto the beginning of the second message (first line, first colon)
* hit "RET"
Result: nothing happens except for "No URL at point" message
Expected result: the second message is shown/hidden
The root cause is that the HTML part has `keymap' text property set.
In particular, "RET" is bound to visit a URL at point. The problem is
that `keymap' property affects the next character following the region
it is set to (see elisp manual [1]). Hence, the first character of
the next message has a keymap inherited from the HTML part.
[1] http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/elisp/html_node/Special-Properties.html
There is existing support for broken tests. But it is not convenient
to use. The primary issue is that we have to maintain a set of
test_expect_*_failure functions which are equivalent to the normal
test_expect_* counterparts except for what functions are called for
result reporting. The patch adds test_subtest_known_broken function
which marks a subset as broken, making the normal test_expect_*
functions behave as test_expect_*_failure. All test_expect_*_failure
functions are removed. Test_known_broken_failure_ is changed to
format details the same way as test_failure_ does.
Another benefit of this change is that the diff when a broken test is
fixed would be small and nice.
Documentation is updated accordingly.
Update test_emacs documentation in test/README according to the latest
changes in emacs tests. Move the note regarding setting variables
from test/emacs to test/README.
The main goal of this overhaul is to define how message/rfc822 parts
should be handled. message/rfc822 parts should be output in a similar
fashion to the outer message, including some subset of the rfc822
headers. The following decisions about formatting of message/rfc822
parts were made:
The format and content of message/rfc822 parts shall be as similar as
possible to that of full messages. In particular, for formatted
outputs, the "content" of rfc822 part output should include "headers"
and "body" fields).
The "body" field shall include the body of the message.
The "headers" field shall include the following headers, since these
are the ones available from the GMimeMessage:
"From"
"To"
"Cc"
"Subject"
"Date"
However, for the case of --format=raw the raw rfc822 should be output,
including all headers.
A subset of relevant headers shall be output in reply.
The test embedded rfc822 message is also modified to be itself
multipart, so we can more fully test how all sub parts of the message
part are output.
Note added by Committer:
Currently, expect one test (--format=raw --part=3, rfc822 part) to fail.
The test message date, "Tue, 05 Jan 2001 15:43:57 -0000", is not
actually a real date. 05 Jan 2001 was in fact a Friday, not a
Tuesday. Date parsers (such as "date" in coreutils) will return "Fri"
as the day for this string, even if "Tue" is specified.
Also, the time zone "-0000" is actually always returned as "+0000", so
we change that here was well.
This will be relevant for later patches when we begin parsing rfc822
part headers, where gmime returns a parsed date string.
If we do want to test date parsing, we should do that in a separate
test.
There were two "--format=text --part=0" tests. One of them was
supposed to be a test for "--format=text --part=1".
There were also two errant "test_expect_equal_file OUTPUT EXPECTED"
lines, that are removed here.
The feature to show subject changes in the collapsed thread view was
originally added (8ab433607) with an option
(notmuch-show-always-show-subject) to display the subject
for all messages, even when there was no change.
The subsequent commit (4f04d273) changed the sense of the test (or to
and) and the name of the controlling variable
(notmuch-show-elide-same-subject).
But this commit is broken in a few ways:
1. The original definition of notmuch-show-always-show-subject was
left around
But the variable isn't actually used in the code at all, so it
just adds clutter and confusion to the customization interface.
2. The name and description of the controlling variable doesn't
match the implementation
The name suggests that setting the variable to t will cause
repeated subjects to be elided, (suggesting that when it is nil
all subjects will be shown).
However, when the variable is nil, no subjects are shown. So a
correct name for the variable in this sense would be
notmuch-show-subject-changes.
Showing subject changes is a useful feature, and should be on by
default. (We don't want to bury generally useful features behind
customizations that users have to find).
Rather than fixing the name of the variable and changing its default
value, here we remove the condition entirely, such that the feature is
enabled unconditionally.
So both the currently-used variable and the stale definition of the
formerly-used are removed.
Also, the one relevant test-suite result is updated, (showing the
intial subject of a collapsed thread, and no subject display for later
messages that do not change the subject).
eb4cf465 introduces changes which weren't part of the submitted
patch (id:"87liwlip2j.fsf@gmail.com"), presumably made during
resolving merge conflicts.
The first one causes the title of a test to be printed a second time,
in place of the correct title:
PASS Message with .. in Message-Id:
PASS Message with .. in Message-Id:
instead of:
PASS Message with .. in Message-Id:
PASS Sending a message via (fake) SMTP
The second one is simply the insertion of a line break, so no harm there.
This commit reverts both changes, as they were clearly accidental.
Signed-off-by: Pieter Praet <pieter@praet.org>
The sleep was to force the directory's mtime to advance between the
previous notmuch new and the subsequent rm;notmuch new.
The current convention is to use the existing increment_mtime function
for this purpose, (which avoids the test suite being slowed down by
calls to sleep).
Thanks to Austin Clements for noticing this undesired sleep.
Test for bug. Current stemming support for notmuch adds extra terms
to the DB which aren't removed when the file renames are detected.
When folder tags are added to a message, Xapian terms for both XFOLDER
and ZXFOLDER are generated. When one of the filenames are
renamed/removed, only the XFOLDER tags are removed, leaving it possible
for a match on a folder: tag that was previously but is no longer a
match in the maildir.
Before the change, every Emacs test ran in a separate Emacs
instance. Starting Emacs many times wastes considerable time and
it gets worse as the test suite grows. The patch solves this by
using a single Emacs server and emacsclient(1) to run multiple
tests. Emacs server is started on the first test_emacs call and
stopped when test_done is called. We take care not to leave
orphan Emacs processes behind when test is terminated by whatever
reason: Emacs server runs a watchdog that periodically checks
that the test is still running.
Some tests need to provide user input. Before the change, this
was done using echo(1) to Emacs stdin. This no longer works and
instead `standard-input' variable is set accordingly to make
`read' return the appropriate string.
Without this, mail messages delivered by emacs_deliver_message might
not be seen by the next invocation of "notmuch new", (which can lead
to test-suite failures if emacs_deliver_message is fast enough).
Change add_email_corpus, emacs_deliver_message and tests to use
$TEST_DIRECTORY instead of '..'.
This improves the behavior of the usage of --root=<dir>, as the
assumption of what '..' means will usually be incorrect.
Document -root option in README and update valgrind to work with
-root.
Instead of generating auxiliary run_emacs script every time
test_emacs is run, do it once in the beginning of the test.
Also, use absolute paths in the script to make it more robust.
Using `setq' for setting variables in Emacs tests affect other
tests that may run in the same Emacs environment. Currently it
works because each test is run in a separate Emacs instance. But
in the future multiple tests will run in a single Emacs instance.
The patch changes all variables to use `let', so the scope of the
change is limited to a single test.
Few Emacs tests used sed(1) to remove unexpected output in the
beginning to avoid getting confused by messages such as "Parsing
/home/cworth/.mailrc... done". This is no longer needed since
tests are run in a temporary home directory instead of the user's
one. So remove these sed(1) calls.
Before the change, the common Emacs test scheme was to print
buffer content to stdout and redirect it to a file or capture it
in a shell variable. This does not work if we switch to using
emacsclient(1) for running the tests, because you can not print
to the stdout in this case. (Actually, you can print to stdout
from Emacs server, but you can not capture the output on
emacsclient(1)).
The patch introduces new Emacs test auxiliary functions:
`test-output' and `test-visible-output'. These functions are
used to save buffer content to a file directly from Emacs. For
most tests the changes are trivial, because Emacs stdout output
was redirected to a file anyway. But some tests captured the
output in a shell variable and compare it with the expected
output using test_expect_equal. These tests are changed to use
files and test_expect_equal_file instead.
Note: even if we do not switch Emacs tests to emacsclient(1), the
patch makes tests cleaner and is an improvement.
Most test_emacs calls have long arguments that consist of many
expressions. Putting them on a single line makes it hard to read
and produces poor diff when they are changed. The patch puts
every expression in test_emacs calls on a separate line.
Few Emacs tests had test_expect_equal_file arguments in the wrong
order: the first argument should be the test output and the
second one should be the expected.
Update the test mail corpus to have two files with the same content to
expose the bug where a single message with multiple filenames only
reports a single filename.
Update expected results for search --output=files to match new
behavior for multiple files corresponding to a single message
Signed-off-by: Mark Anderson <ma.skies@gmail.com>
Various typo fixes in some test-case data.
Signed-off-by: Pieter Praet <pieter@praet.org>
Edited-by: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org> Restricted to just
test-case data.
Various typo fixes in documentation within the code that can be made
available to the user, (emacs function help strings, "notmuch help"
output, notmuch man page, etc.).
Signed-off-by: Pieter Praet <pieter@praet.org>
Edited-by: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org> Restricted to just
documentation and fixed fix of "comman" to "common" rather than
"command".
Various typo fixes in comments within the source code.
Signed-off-by: Pieter Praet <pieter@praet.org>
Edited-by: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org> Restricted to just
source-code comments, (and fixed fix of "descriptios" to "descriptors"
rather than "descriptions").
Various typo fixes in comments within the Makefile and other build scripts.
Signed-off-by: Pieter Praet <pieter@praet.org>
Edited-by: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org> Restricted to just build files.
Various typo fixes in auxiliary text files included with the source,
(README, TODO, etc.).
Signed-off-by: Pieter Praet <pieter@praet.org>
Edited-by: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org> Restricted to just text files.
We exercise each of the documented values (nil, a string, and a
list). For the list, we test matching a specific entry, matching a
catch-all regular expression, and no match at all (in which case there
is no FCC set).
The worry here is that a binary linking with libnotmuch might lose
access to Xapian::Error symbols because libnotmuch hides them.
We are careful here to create ./fakedb/.notmuch in order to trigger a
Xapian exception, and not just a missing file check.
Thanks to jrollins and amddragon for suggestions.
(cherry picked from commit 66f37f5f6864a988f94ddb893e3a176af57f6c8e)
The main() function should be written as just another function with a
return value. This allows for more reliable code reuse. Imagine that
main() grows too large and needs to be factored into multiple
functions. At that point, exit() is probably the wrong thing, yet can
also be hard to notice as it's in less-frequently-tested exceptional
cases.
