Decode and Encode from/to unicode objects as required to be able to take
unicode path names. Previously we would error out when an unicode object
were handed it.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>
The test message date, "Tue, 05 Jan 2001 15:43:57 -0000", is not
actually a real date. 05 Jan 2001 was in fact a Friday, not a
Tuesday. Date parsers (such as "date" in coreutils) will return "Fri"
as the day for this string, even if "Tue" is specified.
Also, the time zone "-0000" is actually always returned as "+0000", so
we change that here was well.
This will be relevant for later patches when we begin parsing rfc822
part headers, where gmime returns a parsed date string.
If we do want to test date parsing, we should do that in a separate
test.
There were two "--format=text --part=0" tests. One of them was
supposed to be a test for "--format=text --part=1".
There were also two errant "test_expect_equal_file OUTPUT EXPECTED"
lines, that are removed here.
Thanks to Sebastian Spaeth breaking out version.py, this can be done
without loading notmuch.py, or using sed. version.py is not (yet)
autogenerated because it seems more important to minimize the
differences between the tagged version and the tarball.
If the configure script detects missing getline and/or getdelim
symbols, then notmuch will use it's own versions. This patch, based on
id:"87k49v12i5.fsf@pc44es141.cs.uni-magdeburg.de" by Matthias
Guedemann, adds the symbols to notmuch.sym as well so they are
properly exported from the library.
OpenBSD nm apparently doesn't support --defined.
The awk condition is based on the assumption that all defined symbols
have some hex number in the first column.
Thanks to Matthias Guedemann reporting the problem, and an earlier
version of this patch.
Emacs lisp function 'member' takes element and list as an
argument. I.e. the second argument is list, not symbol
referencing the list.
On emacs 23.x the member call always returned nil (thus buggy),
on emacs 22.x the call failed, making it unusable.
Importing the notmuch module in setup.py is a no-no, and we want
to auto-generate the version number in the release process.
Outsource __VERSION__ to the new version.py which contains nothing else
and which can therefor easily be autogenerated. Have setup.py read in
the file via execfile and test if importing the version number actually
worked.
This should make all happy.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>
This reverts commit 8826fc2d7b.
It seems that importing the module in setup.py is controversial at best,
as it will fail for users that don't have all dependencies
installed. This was the case in e.g. the Ubuntu autobuilder, so building
notmuch failed. The plan is to create an autogenerated setup.py that can
be used for version information.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>
We were using a template setup.py which parsed __init__.py in complex
ways just to find out the version number. Simply import notmuch and use
__VERSION__ directly. Also adapt some wording and setup.py values while
going through.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>
Unfortunately Robin Green's patch 52e4dedf9a was lost when I created
gen-version-script.sh. This merges his changes manually into that
script. It turns out tabs seem not needed in version script
files, so I simplified a bit and removed the printf.
Thanks to Alexander Botero-Lowry for help and testing.
This prevents unsafe calls to decode for return value None in
get_authors/get_subject which would current throw an Exception. Original
patch modified by Sebastian Spaeth.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>
len() exhausts the tag iterator and e.g. list() or "".join(tags)
implicitly call len() if existing and then failing. So, we remove
Tags.__len__().
If you need to know the number of tags a message has, do use
len(list(tags)). It would be nicer to be able to support len() directly...
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>
If we try to pull a non-existing tag, Tags._get will return None and the
appended .decode() command will fail. So make sure that there is a tag to
be fetched before fetching it.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>
In case, search_threads returns an error we are supposed to throw an
Exception. But we did not "raise" it, this was an oversight and this
commit fixes it.
There is still the problem that there is often output to stderr by
libnotmuch detailing the xapian error and this is simply printed
out. But this requires fixing at the libnotmuch level...
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>
This is a lighter weight version of the release target, intended to
support uploading release candidates to Debian.
As a side effect, filter ~ out of VERSION to make tag names.
If the notmuch.sym target does not explicitly depend on $(libnotmuch_modules),
gen-version-script.sh may be run before all the .o files are created, for
example when doing a parallel build on a machine with many cores.
Conflicts:
lib/Makefile.local
The conflicts are from three kinds of commits not merged into release:
- typo fixes
- removal of debug output
- fix for CLEAN rule
That were never merged into the release branch.
This allows, e.g. gitpkg debian/0.x-1 to do the right thing. It also
helps enforce the convention that Debian upload -1 is identical to the
release tarball.
This generates a seperate notmuch-0.x.debian.tar.gz containing
./debian.
In the initial release this is redundant, but for Debian only updates
between releases, this allows updating the contents of ./debian, and
using the rest of the release tarball.
This supports both testing and use by non-upload privileged
users. Along with previous commits in the series, this lets one do a
dry run of the release process and created a tarball, signature file,
and release announcement to inspect before uploading.
The previous setup was dependent on the git-buildpackage configuration
to find the resulting tar file, and consequently a bit fragile.
We use pristine-tar instead to save a checksum-identical copy of the
tar file. This will also faciliate "non-native" debian packages, if
desired.
dput again depends on the local configuration, and mainly is a bit too
brave for me to do automatically.
The reasoning is that we might have some error in the build system
that causes something not to be rebuilt; this would potentially have
the tests run on the wrong version of the code.
