The function _notmuch_config_load_from_file is only called in two
places in open.cc. Update internal API to match the idiom in open.cc.
Adding a newline is needed for consistency with other status strings.
Based in part on a patch [1] from Eric Blake.
[1]: id:20230906153402.101471-1-eblake@redhat.com
In order for a database to actually be writeable, it must be the case that it
is open, not just the correct type of Xapian object. By explicitely
checking, we are able to provide better error reporting, in particular
for the previously broken test in T566-lib-message.
There are some enum typedefs with the enum name:
typedef enum _name_t { ... } name_t;
We don't need or use the enum names _name_t for anything, and not all
of the enum typedefs have them. We have the typedefs specifically to
use the typedef name.
Use the anonymous enum in the typedefs:
typedef enum { ... } name_t;
In principle this could be done without depending on C++11 features,
but these features should be available since gcc 4.8.1, and this
localized usage is easy to replace if it turns out to be problematic
for portability.
Include the (currently unused) mode argument which will specify which
mode to re-open the database in. Functionality and docs to be
finalized in a followup commit.
Based on a patch from Michael J Gruber [1]. As of glib 2.67 (more
specifically [2]), including "gmime-extra.h" inside an extern "C"
block causes build failures, because glib is using C++ features.
Observing that "gmime-extra.h" is no longer needed in
notmuch-private.h, which can simply delete that include, but
we have to correspondingly move the includes which might include
it (in particular crypto.h) out of the extern "C" block also.
This seems less fragile than only moving gmime-extra, and relying on
preprocessor sentinels to keep the deeper includes from happening.
Move to the include to the outside of the extern block.
[1]: id:aee618a3d41f7889a7449aa16893e992325a909a.1613055071.git.git@grubix.eu
[2]: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/merge_requests/1715
The main goal is to allow configuration information to be temporarily
overridden by a separate config file. That will require further
changes not in this commit.
The performance impact is unclear, and will depend on the balance
between number of queries and number of distinct metadata items read
on the first call to n_d_get_config.
This adds no functionality directly, but is a useful starting point
for adding new repair functionality.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
When indexing the cleartext of an encrypted message, record any
protected subject in the database, which should make it findable and
visible in search.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
This should not change the indexing process yet as nothing calls
_notmuch_message_gen_terms with a user prefix name. On the other hand,
it should not break anything either.
_notmuch_database_prefix does a linear walk of the list of (built-in)
prefixes, followed by a logarithmic time search of the list of user
prefixes. The latter is probably not really noticable.
This will be used to avoid needing a database access to resolve a db
prefix from the corresponding UI prefix (e.g. when indexing). Arguably
the setup of the separate header map does not belong here, since it is
about indexing rather than querying, but we currently don't have any
other indexing setup to do.
The idea is that if a message-id parses with this function, the MUA
generating it was probably sane, and in particular it's probably safe
to use the result as a parent from In-Reply-to.
We (finally) implement the XXX comment. It requires a bit of care not
to reparent all of the possible toplevel messages.
_notmuch_messages_has_next is not ready to be a public function yet,
since it punts on the mset case. We know in the one case it is called,
the notmuch_messages_t is just a regular list / iterator.
There is no public notmuch_message_list_t public interface, so to this
is added to the private API. We use it immediately in thread.cc;
future commits will use it further.
For non-root messages, this should not should anything currently, as
the messages are already added in date order. In the future we will
add some non-root messages in a second pass out of order and the
sorting will be useful. It does fix the order of multiple
root-messages (although it is overkill for that).
We've had _notmuch_message_database() internally for a while, and it's
useful. It turns out to be useful on the other side of the library
interface as well (i'll use it later in this series for "notmuch
show"), so we expose it publicly now.
The observation is that we are only using the messages to get there
thread_id, which is kindof a pessimal access pattern for the current
notmuch_message_get_thread_id
If we see index options that ask us to decrypt when indexing a
message, and we encounter an encrypted part, we'll try to descend into
it.
If we can decrypt, we add the property index.decryption=success.
If we can't decrypt (or recognize the encrypted type of mail), we add
the property index.decryption=failure.
Note that a single message may have both values of the
"index.decryption" property: "success" and "failure". For example,
consider a message that includes multiple layers of encryption. If we
manage to decrypt the outer layer ("index.decryption=success"), but
fail on the inner layer ("index.decryption=failure").
Because of the property name, this will be automatically cleared (and
possibly re-set) during re-indexing. This means it will subsequently
correspond to the actual semantics of the stored index.
This is currently mostly a wrapper around _notmuch_crypto_t that keeps
its internals private and doesn't expose any of the GMime API.
However, non-crypto indexing options might also be added later
(e.g. filters or other transformations).
C99 stdbool turned 18 this year. There really is no reason to use our
own, except in the library interface for backward
compatibility. Convert the lib internally to stdbool.
This new function asks the database to reindex a given message.
The parameter `indexopts` is currently ignored, but is intended to
provide an extensible API to support e.g. changing the encryption or
filtering status (e.g. whether and how certain non-plaintext parts are
indexed).
This operation is relatively inexpensive, as the needed metadata is
already computed by our lazy metadata fetching. The goal is to support
better UI for messages with multipile files.
This is really pure C string parsing, and doesn't need to be mixed in
with the Xapian/C++ layer. Although not strictly necessary, it also
makes it a bit more natural to call _parse_message_id from multiple
compilation units.
Commit d5523ead90 ("Mark some structures in the library interface
with visibility=default attribute.") fixed some mixed visibility
issues with structs. With the symbol default visibility reversed, this
is no longer a problem.
