If the notmuch.sym target does not explicitly depend on $(libnotmuch_modules),
gen-version-script.sh may be run before all the .o files are created, for
example when doing a parallel build on a machine with many cores.
Conflicts:
lib/Makefile.local
The conflicts are from three kinds of commits not merged into release:
- typo fixes
- removal of debug output
- fix for CLEAN rule
That were never merged into the release branch.
This allows, e.g. gitpkg debian/0.x-1 to do the right thing. It also
helps enforce the convention that Debian upload -1 is identical to the
release tarball.
This generates a seperate notmuch-0.x.debian.tar.gz containing
./debian.
In the initial release this is redundant, but for Debian only updates
between releases, this allows updating the contents of ./debian, and
using the rest of the release tarball.
This supports both testing and use by non-upload privileged
users. Along with previous commits in the series, this lets one do a
dry run of the release process and created a tarball, signature file,
and release announcement to inspect before uploading.
The previous setup was dependent on the git-buildpackage configuration
to find the resulting tar file, and consequently a bit fragile.
We use pristine-tar instead to save a checksum-identical copy of the
tar file. This will also faciliate "non-native" debian packages, if
desired.
dput again depends on the local configuration, and mainly is a bit too
brave for me to do automatically.
The reasoning is that we might have some error in the build system
that causes something not to be rebuilt; this would potentially have
the tests run on the wrong version of the code.
The idea is to see if the version we are already releasing exists on
the notmuch website. Using wget allows more people to run this target,
and also allows people with ssh access to run it without access to
their keys.
There is concensus to use non-native version number for updates that
contain only Debian changes. Unfortunately changing back and forth
between native and non-native packages has the potential for
confusion, since the archive will end up with notmuch-0.x.tar.gz and
notmuch-0.x.orig.tar.gz. So we use non-native numbering from the
beginning.
The lack of such exporting seems to cause problems catching
exceptions, as suggested by
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Visibility
This manifested in the symbol-hiding test failing when notmuch was
compile with gcc 4.4.5. On i386, this further manifested as notmuch
new failing to run (crashing with an uncaught exception on first run).
The vim front-end isn't written to handle nested parts.
This patch doesn't change that, it just changes the code to pretend that
multipart/* sections end immediately. This makes the parsing code think that
all sections are top-level, and are thus parsed well enough.
The lovely result of this is that citation folds and signature folds now work
in text/plain parts that are within multipart/* sections. Also, all mime
section starts are now shown correctly (before some were not parsed and showed
the ugly ^L and an ID and so on from notmuch.)
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Also change a passed parameter to be consistent with the current binding. This
parameter appears to be unused.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
This patch rewrites the reformatting of the from list so it shows full
capitalized names when available (without truncating them as the old code did)
and removes the pipe characters that appear between some names.
The old code appears to assume from list (the list of senders in the thread)
coming from notmuch would be e-mail addresses, but in this version it is mostly
full names. Also in this version, the names are sometimes separated by pipe
instead of comma.
For consistency with old versions, names are still truncated at the first
period. Perhaps they shouldn't be though.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
In vim, in the message view, space is supposed to remove the "unread" and
"inbox" tags, but was sometimes adding them instead.
This patch assures that they are always removed by this binding.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
With the trailing slash I get
Error detected while processing function <SNR>10_NM_new_mail..<SNR>10_NM_cmd_compose..<SNR>10_NM_newComposeBuffer..<SNR>10_NM_newFileBuffer:
line 3:
E739: Cannot create directory: /home/ukleinek/.notmuch/compose/
when hitting 'm' to compose a new mail. strace shows:
stat("/home/ukleinek/.notmuch/compose/", 0x7fffee314a10) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
stat("/home/ukleinek/.notmuch/compose/", 0x7fffee314e30) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
stat("/home/ukleinek/.notmuch/compose", 0x7fffee315270) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
stat("/home/ukleinek/.notmuch", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=4096, ...}) = 0
mkdir("/home/ukleinek/.notmuch/compose", 0755) = 0
mkdir("/home/ukleinek/.notmuch/compose/", 0755) = -1 EEXIST (File exists)
so it seems vim's mkdir() isn't able to handle a trailing slash.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Rather than returning simply strings and having to guess their encoding,
return explicit unicode() strings for the tags. Xapian stores UTF8, so
we know that they come as UTF8 encoded string.
Note: I tried to directly use the c_wchar_p type of the ctypes library
which translates directly into an unicode type, but that did not work
out so well, so we take c_char_p and .decode() them manually.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>
If we pass in an unicode instance as query string, we would probably get
weird behavior (and indeed do so, see mail
id:"20110707113700.GA16347@megatron"). If a unicode instance is passed
in, make sure we encode it properly to an utf-8 encoded byte string.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>
It took quite some time to debug why folder: searches didn't work for me
though I had notmuch 0.6~rc1 installed. amdragon in #notmuch found out
that I still had libnotmuch1 0.5+nmu3 installed.
To prevent the same problem in the future let notmuch depend on the same
version of libnotmuch1.
Reviewed-By: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>
The underlying issue is that the libnotmuch interface is not
entirely captured by the set of exported symbols. In particular the
query syntax can change without being visible to the linker at all.
A stupid typo was preventing this from ever working and it was not
detected until now. Patrick noted the typo and proposed the fix in mail
id:"20110704203926.GA20238@brick.lan".
Patch-by: Patrick Totzke <patricktotzke@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>
Fix some typos, add some notes on python bindings, "improve" the folder searching
description, expand the discussion of crypto changes.
This includes the changes from
id:"1309541202-4938-1-git-send-email-dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com"
Thanks to Sebastian, Austin, and Uwe, Dmitry for the editing help.
(cherry picked from commit 74d00bb0e8)
This perhaps breaks the "one thing at a time rule", but seems better
than leaving the changelog pointing to nothing.
(cherry picked from commit 8c5129bb51)
Fix some typos, add some notes on python bindings, "improve" the folder searching
description, expand the discussion of crypto changes.
This includes the changes from
id:"1309541202-4938-1-git-send-email-dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com"
Thanks to Sebastian, Austin, and Uwe, Dmitry for the editing help.
This step was missed during the package split of notmuch to notmuch,
notmuch-emacs, and notmuch-vim.
It seems mostly harmless in this case, but it is silly for non-vim
users to have those directories.
(cherry picked from commit 4b5875d81e)
The feature to show subject changes in the collapsed thread view was
originally added (8ab433607) with an option
(notmuch-show-always-show-subject) to display the subject
for all messages, even when there was no change.
The subsequent commit (4f04d273) changed the sense of the test (or to
and) and the name of the controlling variable
(notmuch-show-elide-same-subject).
But this commit is broken in a few ways:
1. The original definition of notmuch-show-always-show-subject was
left around
But the variable isn't actually used in the code at all, so it
just adds clutter and confusion to the customization interface.
2. The name and description of the controlling variable doesn't
match the implementation
The name suggests that setting the variable to t will cause
repeated subjects to be elided, (suggesting that when it is nil
all subjects will be shown).
However, when the variable is nil, no subjects are shown. So a
correct name for the variable in this sense would be
notmuch-show-subject-changes.
Showing subject changes is a useful feature, and should be on by
default. (We don't want to bury generally useful features behind
customizations that users have to find).
Rather than fixing the name of the variable and changing its default
value, here we remove the condition entirely, such that the feature is
enabled unconditionally.
So both the currently-used variable and the stale definition of the
formerly-used are removed.
Also, the one relevant test-suite result is updated, (showing the
intial subject of a collapsed thread, and no subject display for later
messages that do not change the subject).
(cherry picked from commit 580de27177)
This step was missed during the package split of notmuch to notmuch,
notmuch-emacs, and notmuch-vim.
It seems mostly harmless in this case, but it is silly for non-vim
users to have those directories.
The feature to show subject changes in the collapsed thread view was
originally added (8ab433607) with an option
(notmuch-show-always-show-subject) to display the subject
for all messages, even when there was no change.
The subsequent commit (4f04d273) changed the sense of the test (or to
and) and the name of the controlling variable
(notmuch-show-elide-same-subject).
But this commit is broken in a few ways:
1. The original definition of notmuch-show-always-show-subject was
left around
But the variable isn't actually used in the code at all, so it
just adds clutter and confusion to the customization interface.
2. The name and description of the controlling variable doesn't
match the implementation
The name suggests that setting the variable to t will cause
repeated subjects to be elided, (suggesting that when it is nil
all subjects will be shown).
However, when the variable is nil, no subjects are shown. So a
correct name for the variable in this sense would be
notmuch-show-subject-changes.
Showing subject changes is a useful feature, and should be on by
default. (We don't want to bury generally useful features behind
customizations that users have to find).
Rather than fixing the name of the variable and changing its default
value, here we remove the condition entirely, such that the feature is
enabled unconditionally.
So both the currently-used variable and the stale definition of the
formerly-used are removed.
Also, the one relevant test-suite result is updated, (showing the
intial subject of a collapsed thread, and no subject display for later
messages that do not change the subject).
The last upload to experimental was really a release candidate too.
Switch versioning to ~rc1 as counting commits is confusing when
building from the release branch.
(cherry picked from commit 117852a5f1)
The last upload to experimental was really a release candidate too.
Switch versioning to ~rc1 as counting commits is confusing when
building from the release branch.
as of version 4.3.12, perhaps earlier, the Debian zsh package now
ships /usr/share/zsh/functions/Completion/Unix/_notmuch, so we
shouldn't install that ourselves anymore.
My understanding is that letting zsh ship the completion scripts is
the standard thing to do.
The script is still shipped in /usr/share/doc/notmuch/examples
(cherry picked from commit 0a0f5f1bbe)
