notmuch/test/corpora/lkml/cur/1382298770.002911:2,
David Bremner e08f5f76e4 test: add 'lkml' corpus
These 210 messages are in several long threads, which is good for
testing our threading code, and may be useful just as a larger test
corpus in the future.
2017-04-13 21:55:43 -03:00

84 lines
3.7 KiB
Text

From: Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 05/10] cifs: define superblock-level cache index
objects and register them
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 18:14:16 +0530
Lines: 41
Message-ID: <4C24A4A0.90408@suse.de>
References: <1277220206-3559-1-git-send-email-sjayaraman@suse.de> <yes> <9720.1277312290@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Steve French <smfrench-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>, linux-cifs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
To: David Howells <dhowells-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
X-From: linux-cifs-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org Fri Jun 25 14:44:28 2010
Return-path: <linux-cifs-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Envelope-to: glkc-linux-cifs-1dZseelyfdZg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org
Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67])
by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <linux-cifs-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>)
id 1OS8Gh-0005Bb-E2
for glkc-linux-cifs-1dZseelyfdZg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 14:44:27 +0200
Received: (majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
id S1754703Ab0FYMo0 (ORCPT <rfc822;glkc-linux-cifs@m.gmane.org>);
Fri, 25 Jun 2010 08:44:26 -0400
Received: from cantor.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:51036 "EHLO mx1.suse.de"
rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
id S1754222Ab0FYMoZ (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-cifs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>);
Fri, 25 Jun 2010 08:44:25 -0400
Received: from relay1.suse.de (charybdis-ext.suse.de [195.135.221.2])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E07FF8FEA2;
Fri, 25 Jun 2010 14:44:24 +0200 (CEST)
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091130 SUSE/3.0.0-1.1.1 Thunderbird/3.0
In-Reply-To: <9720.1277312290-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Sender: linux-cifs-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-cifs.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-cifs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1002945>
On 06/23/2010 10:28 PM, David Howells wrote:
> Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
>> Define superblock-level cache index objects (managed by cifsTconInfo
>> structs). Each superblock object is created in a server-level index object
>> and in itself an index into which inode-level objects are inserted.
>>
>> Currently, the superblock objects are keyed by sharename.
>
> Seems reasonable. Is there any way you can check that the share you are
> looking at on a server is the same as the last time you looked? Can you
Good point.
I thought of using TID (Tree identifier; a unique ID for a resource in
use by client) along with sharename. But, Server is free to reuse them
when the tree connection closes and does not guarantee the same Tid for
a particular resource across tree connections.
Also, considering the UNC name of the resource (//server/share) may not
be a good idea too as the cache will not be used when for e.g. IPaddress
is used to mount.
So, if a server does something like this:
- export a share 'foo' (original server path: /export/vol1/foo)
- client mounts and uses it
- server unexports the share 'foo'
- server exports 'foo' (original sever path: /export/vol2/foo)
we have a bit of problem..
> validate the root directory of the share in some way?
>
I don't know if there is a way to do this.
Thanks,
--
Suresh Jayaraman