mirror of
https://git.notmuchmail.org/git/notmuch
synced 2024-12-22 09:24:54 +01:00
e08f5f76e4
These 210 messages are in several long threads, which is good for testing our threading code, and may be useful just as a larger test corpus in the future.
82 lines
3.7 KiB
Text
82 lines
3.7 KiB
Text
From: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
|
|
Subject: Re: rfc: rewrite commit subject line for subsystem maintainer
|
|
preference tool
|
|
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 18:12:27 +0000
|
|
Lines: 26
|
|
Message-ID: <20101116181226.GB26239@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main>
|
|
References: <1289842444.16461.140.camel@Joe-Laptop>
|
|
<20101115182708.GJ12986@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main>
|
|
<1289845830.16461.149.camel@Joe-Laptop>
|
|
<20101115190738.GF3338@sirena.org.uk>
|
|
<1289848458.16461.150.camel@Joe-Laptop>
|
|
<20101115193407.GK12986@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main>
|
|
<1289850773.16461.166.camel@Joe-Laptop>
|
|
<20101116104921.GL12986@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main>
|
|
<1289919077.28741.50.camel@Joe-Laptop>
|
|
<20101116183707.179964dd@schatten.dmk.lab>
|
|
Mime-Version: 1.0
|
|
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
|
|
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>, Jiri Kosina <trivial@kernel.org>,
|
|
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
|
|
alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
|
|
To: Florian Mickler <florian@mickler.org>
|
|
X-From: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Nov 16 19:12:51 2010
|
|
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
|
|
Envelope-to: glk-linux-kernel-3@lo.gmane.org
|
|
Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67])
|
|
by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
|
|
(envelope-from <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>)
|
|
id 1PIQ1Q-0006KJ-Uw
|
|
for glk-linux-kernel-3@lo.gmane.org; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 19:12:49 +0100
|
|
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
|
|
id S1756467Ab0KPSMa (ORCPT <rfc822;glk-linux-kernel-3@m.gmane.org>);
|
|
Tue, 16 Nov 2010 13:12:30 -0500
|
|
Received: from opensource.wolfsonmicro.com ([80.75.67.52]:42692 "EHLO
|
|
opensource2.wolfsonmicro.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL)
|
|
by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755686Ab0KPSM3 (ORCPT
|
|
<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
|
|
Tue, 16 Nov 2010 13:12:29 -0500
|
|
Received: from rakim.wolfsonmicro.main (lumison.wolfsonmicro.com [87.246.78.27])
|
|
by opensource2.wolfsonmicro.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3E8603B44D5;
|
|
Tue, 16 Nov 2010 18:12:28 +0000 (GMT)
|
|
Received: from broonie by rakim.wolfsonmicro.main with local (Exim 4.72)
|
|
(envelope-from <broonie@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main>)
|
|
id 1PIQ15-0000oJ-5s; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 18:12:27 +0000
|
|
Content-Disposition: inline
|
|
In-Reply-To: <20101116183707.179964dd@schatten.dmk.lab>
|
|
X-Cookie: Onward through the fog.
|
|
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
|
|
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
|
|
Precedence: bulk
|
|
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
|
|
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
|
|
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1063261>
|
|
|
|
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 06:37:07PM +0100, Florian Mickler wrote:
|
|
|
|
> My first reaction to this is, it's silly. Certainly a
|
|
> subsystem-maintainer is capable of hacking something together that
|
|
> suits his needs or may just use a good editor to get the job done.
|
|
> After all, he might want to edit the commit message anyway. Also he has
|
|
> to have his act together for all non-conforming submitters anyway,
|
|
> because shurely, telling people to re-edit their patches subject line
|
|
> is not what one would consider "welcoming to newbies", or whatever it
|
|
> is kernel subsystem maintainers have to be nowadays *g*...
|
|
|
|
So, my general policy on this is that I tend to push back on patches
|
|
which don't just work with the toolset (subject lines are just one part
|
|
of it) to a variable extent depending on who's submitting and what
|
|
they're submitting. One of the factors is that the more patches are
|
|
coming from someone the easier I expect their patches to be to work
|
|
with.
|
|
|
|
The reason this came up is that this is one of the issues with Joe's
|
|
patches (which are rather frequent) but he is only willing to do things
|
|
that he can automate.
|
|
|
|
> (MAINTAINERS seems to be the logical place to put this
|
|
> information.)
|
|
|
|
Indeed.
|
|
|
|
|