notmuch/test/corpora/lkml/cur/1382298793.003340:2,
David Bremner e08f5f76e4 test: add 'lkml' corpus
These 210 messages are in several long threads, which is good for
testing our threading code, and may be useful just as a larger test
corpus in the future.
2017-04-13 21:55:43 -03:00

138 lines
5.1 KiB
Text

From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Subject: Re: rfc: rewrite commit subject line for subsystem
maintainer preference tool
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 12:46:09 -0800
Organization: YPO4
Lines: 64
Message-ID: <20101116124609.382e42fb.rdunlap@xenotime.net>
References: <1289845830.16461.149.camel@Joe-Laptop>
<20101115190738.GF3338@sirena.org.uk>
<1289848458.16461.150.camel@Joe-Laptop>
<20101115193407.GK12986@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main>
<1289850773.16461.166.camel@Joe-Laptop>
<20101116104921.GL12986@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main>
<1289919077.28741.50.camel@Joe-Laptop>
<20101116183707.179964dd@schatten.dmk.lab>
<20101116181226.GB26239@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main>
<20101116203522.65240b18@schatten.dmk.lab>
<20101116195530.GA7523@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main>
<20101116122102.86e7e0b9.rdunlap@xenotime.net>
<1289940156.28741.207.camel@Joe-Laptop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Jiri Kosina <trivial@kernel.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Florian Mickler <florian@mickler.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
X-From: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Tue Nov 16 21:46:23 2010
Return-path: <alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org>
Envelope-to: glad-alsa-devel-2@m.gmane.org
Received: from alsa0.perex.cz ([212.20.107.51])
by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org>)
id 1PISQ1-0000rd-2s
for glad-alsa-devel-2@m.gmane.org; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 21:46:21 +0100
Received: by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 5421B2438C; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 21:46:20 +0100 (CET)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on mail1.perex.cz
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.0 required=5.0 tests=PRX_BODY_29 autolearn=disabled
version=3.2.4
Received: from alsa0.perex.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 774FE24390;
Tue, 16 Nov 2010 21:46:19 +0100 (CET)
X-Original-To: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
Delivered-To: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
Received: by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 6051924391; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 21:46:17 +0100 (CET)
Received: from xenotime.net (xenotime.net [72.52.115.56])
by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with SMTP id 4F17D2438C
for <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 21:46:15 +0100 (CET)
Received: from chimera.site ([173.50.240.230]) by xenotime.net for
<alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 12:46:10 -0800
In-Reply-To: <1289940156.28741.207.camel@Joe-Laptop>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.7.1 (GTK+ 2.16.6; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
X-BeenThere: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Alsa-devel mailing list for ALSA developers -
http://www.alsa-project.org" <alsa-devel.alsa-project.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel>,
<mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel>,
<mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org
Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1063371>
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 12:42:36 -0800 Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 12:21 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 19:55:31 +0000 Mark Brown wrote:
> > I don't know what you asked Joe to change, but asking someone to use
> > the documented canonical patch format:
> > <quote>
> > The canonical patch subject line is:
> > Subject: [PATCH 001/123] subsystem: summary phrase
> > </quote>
> > should be fine. And there is no need for printf-ish templates
> > for this in MAINTAINERS either.
>
> I've never read that before. Learn something new etc...
> It seems path prefixes aren't good nor even commonly used.
>
> A review of kernel patch subjects:
>
> $ git log --no-merges --pretty=oneline | \
> cut -f2- -d" " | cut -f1 -d: | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn
>
> is interesting. Here's the head:
> 5007 x86
> 3943 Staging
> 3220 USB
> 2790 sh
> 2707 KVM
> 2624 ARM
> 2449 ALSA
> 1571 Input
> 1549 ASoC
> 1470 iwlwifi
> 1423 ACPI
> 1397 mac80211
> 1384 V4L/DVB
> 1226 sched
> 1200 Btrfs
> 1184 powerpc
> 1106 [NETFILTER]
> 1080 MIPS
> 1049 net
> 1047 ide
> 1014 drm/i915
> 993 staging
> 921 ath9k
$ARCH is a commonly accepted substitute for subsystem.
And yes, lots of people use <drivername> there as well.
> Some subsystem maintainers like upper case, some mixed, some lower.
> Some aren't consistent. (Staging/staging)
Case usually doesn't matter to most of us.
> It doesn't seem a rule can be pregenerated so maybe adding these
> "C:" lines to MAINTAINERS has some value.
Hopefully it won't go that far.
---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***