notmuch/test/corpora/lkml/cur/1382298793.003459:2,
David Bremner e08f5f76e4 test: add 'lkml' corpus
These 210 messages are in several long threads, which is good for
testing our threading code, and may be useful just as a larger test
corpus in the future.
2017-04-13 21:55:43 -03:00

88 lines
4.1 KiB
Text

From: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Subject: Re: rfc: rewrite commit subject line for subsystem
maintainer preference tool
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 23:22:58 +0000
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <20101116232258.GC24623@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
References: <1289850773.16461.166.camel@Joe-Laptop>
<20101116104921.GL12986@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main>
<1289919077.28741.50.camel@Joe-Laptop>
<20101116183707.179964dd@schatten.dmk.lab>
<20101116181226.GB26239@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main>
<20101116203522.65240b18@schatten.dmk.lab>
<20101116195530.GA7523@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main>
<20101116122102.86e7e0b9.rdunlap@xenotime.net>
<1289940156.28741.207.camel@Joe-Laptop>
<20101116124609.382e42fb.rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Jiri Kosina <trivial@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Florian Mickler <florian@mickler.org>,
Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
X-From: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Wed Nov 17 00:22:58 2010
Return-path: <alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org>
Envelope-to: glad-alsa-devel-2@m.gmane.org
Received: from alsa0.perex.cz ([212.20.107.51])
by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org>)
id 1PIUrZ-0001Km-F5
for glad-alsa-devel-2@m.gmane.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 00:22:57 +0100
Received: by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 28F9610381A; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 00:22:55 +0100 (CET)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on mail1.perex.cz
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled
version=3.2.4
Received: from alsa0.perex.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CC8D10381B;
Wed, 17 Nov 2010 00:22:55 +0100 (CET)
X-Original-To: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
Delivered-To: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
Received: by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id B1B8B10381B; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 00:22:52 +0100 (CET)
Received: from opensource2.wolfsonmicro.com (opensource.wolfsonmicro.com
[80.75.67.52]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB03810381A
for <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 00:22:51 +0100 (CET)
Received: from finisterre.wolfsonmicro.main
(cpc3-sgyl4-0-0-cust125.sgyl.cable.virginmedia.com [82.41.240.126])
by opensource2.wolfsonmicro.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 39A957881C9;
Tue, 16 Nov 2010 23:22:51 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from broonie by finisterre.wolfsonmicro.main with local (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>)
id 1PIUra-0001BL-NS; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 23:22:58 +0000
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20101116124609.382e42fb.rdunlap@xenotime.net>
X-Cookie: Beware of Bigfoot!
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
X-BeenThere: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Alsa-devel mailing list for ALSA developers -
http://www.alsa-project.org" <alsa-devel.alsa-project.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel>,
<mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel>,
<mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org
Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1063492>
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:46:09PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 12:42:36 -0800 Joe Perches wrote:
> > Some subsystem maintainers like upper case, some mixed, some lower.
> > Some aren't consistent. (Staging/staging)
> Case usually doesn't matter to most of us.
Given that we're working in case sensitive languages here it's probably
safe to assume that a reasonable proportion of people will care; being
reasonably consistent with existing practice for the subsystem seems
sensible.