mirror of
https://git.notmuchmail.org/git/notmuch
synced 2024-12-22 09:24:54 +01:00
e08f5f76e4
These 210 messages are in several long threads, which is good for testing our threading code, and may be useful just as a larger test corpus in the future.
95 lines
3.6 KiB
Text
95 lines
3.6 KiB
Text
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
|
|
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] x86: ifdef INTR_REMAP code out
|
|
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 12:02:31 +0100
|
|
Lines: 41
|
|
Message-ID: <20110214110231.GB7140@elte.hu>
|
|
References: <1297677612-12405-1-git-send-email-henne@nachtwindheim.de>
|
|
<1297677612-12405-3-git-send-email-henne@nachtwindheim.de>
|
|
Mime-Version: 1.0
|
|
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
|
|
Cc: mingo@readhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, hpa@zytor.com,
|
|
x86@kernel.org, tj@kernel.org, yinghai@kernel.org,
|
|
ak@linux.intel.com, robert.richter@amd.com,
|
|
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
|
|
To: Henrik Kretzschmar <henne@nachtwindheim.de>
|
|
X-From: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Feb 14 12:02:52 2011
|
|
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
|
|
Envelope-to: glk-linux-kernel-3@lo.gmane.org
|
|
Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67])
|
|
by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
|
|
(envelope-from <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>)
|
|
id 1PowCg-00022G-BR
|
|
for glk-linux-kernel-3@lo.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 12:02:50 +0100
|
|
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
|
|
id S1752997Ab1BNLCn (ORCPT <rfc822;glk-linux-kernel-3@m.gmane.org>);
|
|
Mon, 14 Feb 2011 06:02:43 -0500
|
|
Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:38974 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu"
|
|
rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
|
|
id S1751314Ab1BNLCl (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
|
|
Mon, 14 Feb 2011 06:02:41 -0500
|
|
Received: from elvis.elte.hu ([157.181.1.14])
|
|
by mx3.mail.elte.hu with esmtp (Exim)
|
|
id 1PowCQ-0003df-Gk
|
|
from <mingo@elte.hu>; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 12:02:34 +0100
|
|
Received: by elvis.elte.hu (Postfix, from userid 1004)
|
|
id 0D9343E2369; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 12:02:32 +0100 (CET)
|
|
Content-Disposition: inline
|
|
In-Reply-To: <1297677612-12405-3-git-send-email-henne@nachtwindheim.de>
|
|
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17)
|
|
Received-SPF: neutral (mx3: 157.181.1.14 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of elte.hu) client-ip=157.181.1.14; envelope-from=mingo@elte.hu; helo=elvis.elte.hu;
|
|
X-ELTE-SpamScore: -2.0
|
|
X-ELTE-SpamLevel:
|
|
X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no
|
|
X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0
|
|
X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-2.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.5
|
|
-2.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
|
|
[score: 0.0000]
|
|
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
|
|
Precedence: bulk
|
|
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
|
|
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
|
|
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1099671>
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Henrik Kretzschmar <henne@nachtwindheim.de> wrote:
|
|
|
|
> +#ifdef CONFIG_INTR_REMAP
|
|
> + struct IO_APIC_route_entry **ioapic_entries = NULL;
|
|
> +
|
|
> if (intr_remapping_enabled) {
|
|
> ioapic_entries = alloc_ioapic_entries();
|
|
> if (!ioapic_entries) {
|
|
> @@ -2133,6 +2136,7 @@ static int lapic_resume(struct sys_device *dev)
|
|
> mask_IO_APIC_setup(ioapic_entries);
|
|
> legacy_pic->mask_all();
|
|
> }
|
|
> +#endif
|
|
>
|
|
> if (x2apic_mode)
|
|
> enable_x2apic();
|
|
> @@ -2173,6 +2177,7 @@ static int lapic_resume(struct sys_device *dev)
|
|
> apic_write(APIC_ESR, 0);
|
|
> apic_read(APIC_ESR);
|
|
>
|
|
> +#ifdef CONFIG_INTR_REMAP
|
|
> if (intr_remapping_enabled) {
|
|
> reenable_intr_remapping(x2apic_mode);
|
|
> legacy_pic->restore_mask();
|
|
> @@ -2180,6 +2185,7 @@ static int lapic_resume(struct sys_device *dev)
|
|
> free_ioapic_entries(ioapic_entries);
|
|
> }
|
|
> restore:
|
|
> +#endif
|
|
|
|
Hm, these bits should be factored out in a cleaner fashion - by adding helper
|
|
functions, etc. The x2apic code's integration into the lapic code was done in a
|
|
pretty ugly fashion so it's not your fault - but if we want to reintroduce UP-IOAPIC
|
|
we need to do it cleanly.
|
|
|
|
Do you still want to do it? :-)
|
|
|
|
Thanks,
|
|
|
|
Ingo
|
|
|
|
|