debian/notmuch
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.notmuchmail.org/git/notmuch synced 2024-11-22 19:08:09 +01:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions
notmuch/test/emacs.expected-output/notmuch-hello-view-inbox

24 lines
2.7 KiB
Text
Raw Normal View History

Make author order tests more strict. Use varying dates in the test messages to test the order authors are listed in. Add tests with repeated author names and unusual date ordering. Most of these are broken at the moment, but will be fixed shortly. Edited-by: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>: Also update the expected results for existing emacs tests that currently codify the incorrect author ordering, (and similarly note them as broken in the current test suite).
2010-11-17 20:27:59 +01:00
2009-11-17 [5/5] Mikhail Gusarov, Carl Worth, Keith Packard [notmuch] [PATCH 1/2] Close message file after parsing message headers (inbox unread)
2009-11-17 [7/7] Lars Kellogg-Stedman, Mikhail Gusarov, Keith Packard, Carl Worth [notmuch] Working with Maildir storage? (inbox unread)
2009-11-17 [2/2] Alex Botero-Lowry, Carl Worth [notmuch] preliminary FreeBSD support (attachment inbox unread)
test: Clear the "BROKEN" flag on an existing emacs test I still don't know everything about how I want search order to be customizable, but I do like the current defaults, (namely, performing a new search gives results newest first, but performing a saved search like "tag:inbox" gives results as oldest first). Until we come up with a better plan for people to select what *they* want, (rather than just getting what I want), let's codify the current results in the test suite.
2010-11-05 21:59:45 +01:00
2009-11-17 [1/1] Mikhail Gusarov [notmuch] [PATCH] Handle rename of message file (inbox unread)
Make author order tests more strict. Use varying dates in the test messages to test the order authors are listed in. Add tests with repeated author names and unusual date ordering. Most of these are broken at the moment, but will be fixed shortly. Edited-by: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>: Also update the expected results for existing emacs tests that currently codify the incorrect author ordering, (and similarly note them as broken in the current test suite).
2010-11-17 20:27:59 +01:00
2009-11-17 [2/2] Keith Packard, Carl Worth [notmuch] [PATCH] Make notmuch-show 'X' (and 'x') commands remove inbox (and unread) tags (inbox unread)
2009-11-17 [2/2] Jan Janak, Carl Worth [notmuch] [PATCH] Older versions of install do not support -C. (inbox unread)
2009-11-17 [3/3] Jan Janak, Carl Worth [notmuch] What a great idea! (inbox unread)
2009-11-17 [3/3] Israel Herraiz, Keith Packard, Carl Worth [notmuch] New to the list (inbox unread)
2009-11-17 [3/3] Adrian Perez de Castro, Keith Packard, Carl Worth [notmuch] Introducing myself (inbox unread)
2009-11-17 [3/3] Aron Griffis, Keith Packard, Carl Worth [notmuch] archive (inbox unread)
2009-11-17 [2/2] Ingmar Vanhassel, Carl Worth [notmuch] [PATCH] Typsos (inbox unread)
2009-11-18 [2/2] Alex Botero-Lowry, Carl Worth [notmuch] [PATCH] Error out if no query is supplied to search instead of going into an infinite loop (attachment inbox unread)
test: Update mail corpus with original mails (with attachments). The original mails used to pupulate the mail corpus had had their attachments (obnoxiously) scrubbed by the pipermail mail archiver. Since we actually want to test the handling of attachments, this is less than useful. Restore these files from my own collection, (with some Received and similar headers pruned).
2010-11-06 01:17:53 +01:00
2009-11-18 [2/2] Lars Kellogg-Stedman [notmuch] "notmuch help" outputs to stderr? (attachment inbox unread)
test: Clear the "BROKEN" flag on an existing emacs test I still don't know everything about how I want search order to be customizable, but I do like the current defaults, (namely, performing a new search gives results newest first, but performing a saved search like "tag:inbox" gives results as oldest first). Until we come up with a better plan for people to select what *they* want, (rather than just getting what I want), let's codify the current results in the test suite.
2010-11-05 21:59:45 +01:00
2009-11-18 [1/1] Stewart Smith [notmuch] [PATCH] Fix linking with gcc to use g++ to link in C++ libs. (inbox unread)
2009-11-18 [1/1] Stewart Smith [notmuch] [PATCH 2/2] Read mail directory in inode number order (inbox unread)
2009-11-18 [1/1] Stewart Smith [notmuch] [PATCH] count_files: sort directory in inode order before statting (inbox unread)
Make author order tests more strict. Use varying dates in the test messages to test the order authors are listed in. Add tests with repeated author names and unusual date ordering. Most of these are broken at the moment, but will be fixed shortly. Edited-by: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>: Also update the expected results for existing emacs tests that currently codify the incorrect author ordering, (and similarly note them as broken in the current test suite).
2010-11-17 20:27:59 +01:00
2009-11-18 [4/4] Jjgod Jiang, Alexander Botero-Lowry [notmuch] Mac OS X/Darwin compatibility issues (inbox unread)
test: Clear the "BROKEN" flag on an existing emacs test I still don't know everything about how I want search order to be customizable, but I do like the current defaults, (namely, performing a new search gives results newest first, but performing a saved search like "tag:inbox" gives results as oldest first). Until we come up with a better plan for people to select what *they* want, (rather than just getting what I want), let's codify the current results in the test suite.
2010-11-05 21:59:45 +01:00
2009-11-18 [1/1] Jan Janak [notmuch] [PATCH] notmuch new: Support for conversion of spool subdirectories into tags (inbox unread)
2009-11-18 [1/1] Rolland Santimano [notmuch] Link to mailing list archives ? (inbox unread)
emacs: Improve the display of truncated authors. Incremental search does not match strings that span a visible/invisible boundary. This results in failure to correctly isearch for authors in `notmuch-search' mode if the name of the author is split between the visible and invisible components of the authors string. To avoid this, attempt to truncate the visible component of the authors string on a boundary between authors, such that the entirety of an author's name is either visible or invisible.
2010-11-17 13:05:04 +01:00
2009-11-18 [1/1] Alexander Botero-Lowry [notmuch] request for pull (inbox unread)
Make author order tests more strict. Use varying dates in the test messages to test the order authors are listed in. Add tests with repeated author names and unusual date ordering. Most of these are broken at the moment, but will be fixed shortly. Edited-by: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>: Also update the expected results for existing emacs tests that currently codify the incorrect author ordering, (and similarly note them as broken in the current test suite).
2010-11-17 20:27:59 +01:00
2009-11-18 [2/2] Keith Packard, Alexander Botero-Lowry [notmuch] [PATCH] Create a default notmuch-show-hook that highlights URLs and uses word-wrap (inbox unread)
test: Clear the "BROKEN" flag on an existing emacs test I still don't know everything about how I want search order to be customizable, but I do like the current defaults, (namely, performing a new search gives results newest first, but performing a saved search like "tag:inbox" gives results as oldest first). Until we come up with a better plan for people to select what *they* want, (rather than just getting what I want), let's codify the current results in the test suite.
2010-11-05 21:59:45 +01:00
2009-11-18 [1/1] Chris Wilson [notmuch] [PATCH 1/2] Makefile: evaluate pkg-config once (inbox unread)
End of search results.
Reference in a new issue Copy permalink