Modify the show view key bindings as follows to make them more
consistent:
'a' = Archive current message, then move to next message, or show next
thread from search if at the last message in thread.
'A' = Archive each message in thread, then show next thread from
search.
'x' = Archive current message, then move to next message, or exit back
to search results if at the last message in thread.
'X' = Archive each message in thread, then exit back to search
results.
The changes make the key bindings more consistent in two ways:
1) 'a'/'A' both advance to the next thread like 'a' used to.
2) 'x' operates on messages and 'X' on threads like 'a'/'A'.
This makes the argument names more consistent and clear. The
following functions changed: `notmuch-tag',
`notmuch-search-tag-thread', `notmuch-search-tag-region' and
`notmuch-search-tag-all'.
Since `notmuch-tag' is a non-interactive function and hence is meant
to be invoked programmatically, it should accept zero tags. Also, the
tagging operations (bound to "*", "+", "-") would accept empty input
without an error.
The tag syntax check in `notmuch-tag' function was too strict and did
not allow nmbug tags with "::". Since the check is done for all
tagging operations in Emacs UI, this basically means that no nmbug
tags can be changed. The patch relaxes the tag syntax check to allow
any tag names that do not include whitespace characters.
Some tag-related operations accept a single tag without prefix
(`notmuch-select-tag-with-completion'), others accept multiple tags
prefixed with '+' or '-' (`notmuch-read-tag-changes'). Before the
change, both functions used a single default minibuffer history. This
is inconvenient because you have to skip options with incompatible
format when going through the history. The patch adds separate
history lists for the two functions. Note that functions that accept
the same input format (e.g. "+", "-", "*") share the history list as
before.
The patch adds `notmuch-show-tag-all' function bound to "*" in
notmuch-show view. The function is similar to the
`notmuch-search-tag-all' function for the notmuch-search view: it
changes tags for all messages in the current thread.
After the recent tagging operations changes, functions bound to "+"
and "-" in notmuch-search and notmuch-show views always read input
from the minibuffer. Use kbd macros instead of calling them directly.
Before the change, "+" and "-" tagging operations in notmuch-show view
accepted only a single tag. The patch makes them use the recently
added `notmuch-read-tag-changes' function, which allows to enter
multiple tags with "+" and "-" prefixes. So after the change, "+" and
"-" bindings in notmuch-show view allow to both add and remove
multiple tags. The only difference between "+" and "-" is the
minibuffer initial input ("+" and "-" respectively).
Before the change, "+" and "-" tagging operations in notmuch-search
view accepted only a single tag. The patch makes them use the
recently added `notmuch-read-tag-changes' function (renamed
`notmuch-select-tags-with-completion'), which allows to enter multiple
tags with "+" and "-" prefixes. So after the change, "+" and "-"
bindings in notmuch-search view allow to both add and remove multiple
tags. The only difference between "+" and "-" is the minibuffer
initial input ("+" and "-" respectively).
Before the change, tag format validation was done in
`notmuch-search-operate-all' function only. The patch moves it down
to `notmuch-tag', so that all users of that function get input
validation.
As Aaron explains in id:"m2vco72tf3.fsf@wal122.wireless-pennnet.upenn.edu"
Using point-max would include the signature in the quoting as well.
It would probably be fairly odd to want to put an MML tag in one’s
signature, but that doesn’t mean that we should break that usage.
We had to use point-max in the 0.11.1 bug-fix release, because the
mark functionality was added post 0.11.
`Notmuch-wash-region-to-button' is the function that creates hidden
regions with buttons for signatures, citations and original messages.
Before the change, it did not work correctly if the to-be-hidden
region started at the beginning of a message: the visibility toggle
button was hidden as well. The patch fixes this. There are two parts
in the fix:
* Use `insert-before-markers' instead of `insert' for creating the
button, so that it does not get added to the hidden overlay.
* Stop using PREFIX argument for adding a newline before the button.
The newline should not be added before a button at the beginning of
buffer.
The corresponding test is fixed now.
The test is currently broken and will be fixed by a subsequent patch.
The patch adds a new file for tests of Emacs notmuch-show view.
Based on patch by David Edmondson [1].
[1] id:"1327562380-12894-4-git-send-email-dme@dme.org"
The blank line doesn't really change position, but is now considered
to be part of the body rather than part of the headers. This means
that it is visible when the body is visible rather than when the
headers are visible.
Previously, we manually "free"d various pointers in
notmuch_database_open. Use a local talloc context instead to simplify
cleanup and eliminate various NULL pointer initializations and
conditionals.
In the error-handling paths of notmuch_database_open, we call
notmuch_database_close, which "delete"s several objects referenced by
the notmuch_database_t object. However, some of these pointers may be
uninitialized, resulting in undefined behavior. Hence, allocate the
notmuch_database_t with talloc_zero to make sure these pointers are
NULL so that "delete"ing them is harmless.
As of commit b3caef1f, we're using g_array_unref() in 'lib/query.cc',
which was only introduced in glib 2.22, so update the dependency.
Thanks to datapipe@gmail.com for reporting this [1].
Also see commit b88e6abc.
[1] id:"alpine.DEB.2.02.1201132130220.21970@ltspubuntu4.int.smq.datapipe.net"
Emacs message-mode uses certain text strings to indicate how to attach
files to outgoing mail. If these are present in the text of an email,
and a user is tricked into replying to the message, the user’s files
could be exposed.
Edited-by: Pieter Praet <pieter@praet.org>: Rebased to release branch.
The test is broken at this time; the next commit will introduce a fix.
Edited-by: Pieter Praet <pieter@praet.org>:
Rebased to release branch, moved expected output into the actual test,
and fixed "Fcc:" line.
This changes the default key bindings for the 'a' key in notmuch-show
mode. Instead of archiving the entire thread, it now just archives
the current message, and then advance to the next open message
(archive-message-then-next). 'A' is now bound to the previous
archive-thread-then-next function.
This will allow for keybindings that achieve a smoother message
processing flow by reducing the number of key presses needed for most
common operations.
This adds two new message archiving functions that parallel the thread
archiving functions: notmuch-show-archive-message{,-then-next}. The
former also takes a prefix argument to unarchive the message (ie. put
back in inbox).
This function is now just for archiving the current thread. A new
function is created to archive-then-next. The 'a' key binding is
updated accordingly.
This will allow people to bind to the simple thread archiving function
without the extra navigation. The archive-thread function now also
takes a prefix to unarchive the current thread (ie. put the whole
thread back in the inbox).
Break up notmuch-show-archive-thread-internal into two new functions:
notmuch-show-tag-thread-internal: applies a tag to all messages in
thread. If option remove flag is t, tags will be removed instead of
added.
notmuch-show-next-thread: moves to the next thread in the search
result. If given a prefix, will show the next result, otherwise will
just move to it in the search view.
Two new interactive functions, notmuch-show-{add,remove}-tag-thread,
are also added. Together, these provide a better suit of thread
tagging and navigation tools.
The higher level thread archiving functions are modified to use these
new function.
Moved static functions _config_get_list () and _config_set_list ()
closer to the beginning of file so that their definition is known
(without adding forward declarations) in upcoming changes.
