readelf on (at least) ppc64le sometimes generates some extension to
the Ndx name inside '[]'. Remove this output to allow our simple
column based parsing to work.
A typo in Database._create_query lost the exclude_tag names during the
string to utf-8 conversion.
Amended by DB: fixed patch format and updated commit message.
It turns out that using nm -P isn't as portable as hoped. In
particular with some ELF ABIs (e.g. ppc64 ELFv1), the desired symbols
end up in the data section instead of text.
The test is currently only functional on ELF based architectures, so I
think it's legit to depend on readelf instead of nm.
The switch to readelf has the advantage that we can explicitely ask
for all of the symbols with global visibility, rather than grepping
for notmuch. That seems a more robust approach since it will catch any
strangely named global symbols.
Under a sufficiently high level of parallelism [1] there seems to be a
a race condition that allows sphinx-build to start running before the
docstrings are extracted. This change moves the docstring stamp from
the phony targets sphinx-html and sphinx-info to the file targets that
they depend on. I'm not sure why this makes things better, but I am
fairly confident it does not make things worse, and experimentally it
seems to eliminate the race condition.
[1]: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=976934
Building Notmuch on macOS is known to cause problems because the Notmuch
distribution archive contains two files named "version". These names
clash with the <version> header as defined in C++20. Therefore, the
existing naming will likely become a problem on other platforms as well,
once compilers adopt the new standard.
Signed-off-by: Ralph Seichter <github@seichter.de>
Amended-by: db s/keyword/header/ in commit message.
As diagnosed by Olivier Taïbi in
id:20201027100916.emry3k2wujod4xnl@galois.lan, if an exception is
thrown while the initialization is happening (e.g. if the function is
called on a closed database), then the destructor is (sometimes)
invoked on an uninitialized Xapian object.
Solve the problem by moving the setting of the destructor until after
the placement new successfully completes. It is conceivable this might
cause a memory leak, but that seems preferable to crashing, and in any
case, there seems to be nothing better to be done if the
initialization is failing things are in an undefined state by
definition.
For portability; the realpath command (e.g. from GNU coreutils)
is not so common outside Linux systems.
The "$(cd emacs && pwd -P)" replaces that realpath(1) execution
suitably in this context (using just bash(1) builtins).
With text-quoting-style 'grave keeps "'" and "`" quotes unaltered
for further processing done by this code (regardless of locale...).
The tools that read the reStructuredText markup generated can do
their styling instead.
Added temporary conversions of ' and ` to \001 and \002 so that
's and `s outside of `...' and `...` are converted separately
('s restored back to ' and `s converted to \`).
Both `...' and `...` are finally "converted" to `...` (not ``...``).
https://docutils.sourceforge.io/docs/user/rst/quickref.html documents
that as `interpreted text`:
"The rendering and meaning of interpreted text is domain- or
application-dependent. It can be used for things like index
entries or explicit descriptive markup (like program identifiers)."
Which looks pretty much right.
Currently `message-send-hook` functions are being called twice: In
notmuch send common when `notmuch-mua-send-hook` functions are
run (which by default includes `notmuch-mua-message-send-hook`) and in
`message-send` itself.
Because `message-send-hook` functions are run in `message-send` itself,
we don't need also need to run them before we delegate to `message-send`
Calling `notmuch-mua-message-send-hook` resulted in functions in
`message-send-hook` to be called twice. This causes bugs in
non-idempotent hook functions.
notmuch insert does not currently support passing a filename for the
input, so all of these tests have an extra error in addition to the
one being tested for.
Currently this does not make a difference because the error being
tested for is caught before the error of an extra command line
argument. In the future it might make a difference, and in any case it
is confusing.
