Indent the directive properly to attach it to Threads autoclass
documentation.
Fixes:
WARNING: don't know which module to import for autodocumenting
'__str__' (try placing a "module" or "currentmodule" directive in the
document, or giving an explicit module name)
The simplistic mocking in conf.py falls short on python 3.7. Just use
unittest.mock instead.
Fixes:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/sphinx/config.py", line 368, in eval_config_file
execfile_(filename, namespace)
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/sphinx/util/pycompat.py", line 150, in execfile_
exec_(code, _globals)
File "/path/to/notmuch/bindings/python/docs/source/conf.py", line 39, in <module>
from notmuch import __VERSION__,__AUTHOR__
File "/path/to/notmuch/bindings/python/notmuch/__init__.py", line 54, in <module>
from .database import Database
File "/path/to/notmuch/bindings/python/notmuch/database.py", line 25, in <module>
from .globals import (
File "/path/to/notmuch/bindings/python/notmuch/globals.py", line 48, in <module>
class NotmuchDatabaseS(Structure):
TypeError: __mro_entries__ must return a tuple
When invoking gpg as a backgrounded tool, it's important to let gpg
know that it is backgrounded, to avoid spurious prompts or other
breakage.
In particular, https://bugs.debian.org/913614 was a regression in
GnuPG which causes problems when importing keys without a terminal,
but gpg expects one.
Ensuring that notmuch-emacs always invokes gpg as a background process
should avoid some of these unnecessary failure.
Thanks to Justus Winter for finding this problem.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
This adds completion files for zsh that cover most of notmuch's cli.
The files in completion/zsh are formatted so that they can be found by
zsh's completion system if put $fpath. They are also registered to the
notmuch-* pattern, so they can be called externally using _dispatch.
Update installation recipe and drop debian/notmuch.examples to avoid
breakage. This means zsh completion is not installed for debian, to be
fixed in a future commit.
Amended by db: use regexp searching for address completion. This seems
to be fast enough to work without a cache.
The main goal here is to be able to install the notmuch-mutt script
with an absolute shebang. I have tried to make the notmuch-mutt
Makefile use configure information from notmuch if available, but make
suitable guesses if not.
If the database path specified in the configuration file does *not*
start with a /, presume that it is relative to $HOME and modify the
path used to open the database accordingly.
In current Debian sid / testing, emacs25 is a transitional package,
and emacs-gtk, emacs-lucid, and emacs-nox are the real packages.
Emacs 23 is not available in emacs after oldoldstable.
As reported by Sean Whitton, there are mailers (in particular the
Debian Bug Tracking System) that have sensible In-Reply-To headers,
but un-useful-for-notmuch References (in particular with the BTS, the
oldest reference is last). I looked at a sample of about 200K
messages, and only about 0.5% these had something other than a single
message-id in In-Reply-To. On this basis, if we see a single
message-id in In-Reply-To, consider that as authoritative.
The idea is that if a message-id parses with this function, the MUA
generating it was probably sane, and in particular it's probably safe
to use the result as a parent from In-Reply-to.
In a future commit, we will start trusting In-Reply-To's when they
look sane (i.e. a single message-id). Modify these tests so they will
keep passing (i.e. keep choosing References) when that happens.
The current scheme of choosing the replyto (i.e. the default parent
for threading purposes) does not work well for mailers that put
the oldest Reference last.
We (finally) implement the XXX comment. It requires a bit of care not
to reparent all of the possible toplevel messages.
_notmuch_messages_has_next is not ready to be a public function yet,
since it punts on the mset case. We know in the one case it is called,
the notmuch_messages_t is just a regular list / iterator.
This is mainly to lay out the structure of the final code. The problem
isn't really solved yet, although some very simple cases are
better (hence the fixed test). We need two passes through the messages
because we need to be careful not to re-parent too many messages and
end up without any toplevel messages.
